Regarding "Dogs as a work perk" (Variety, Jan. 10):
After a 1.5-hour highway commute through the snow, a trudge through a concrete parking ramp, and nine hours sitting in a cubicle — who says I want to come to work with you?
Sincerely,
Your Dog
P.S. Take me out!
Andrew Frame, Apple Valley
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Ask big questions; don't waste time on anger over coach's salary
Following the hiring of P.J. Fleck as the new head coach of the men's football team at the University of Minnesota, many, including some letter writers printed on this page, have expressed dismay at the exorbitant $3.6 million annual salary he will receive from our state's flagship public university. I have no qualms with this argument. When examined in a vacuum, this is an outrageous price for an amateur athletics coach.
Nonetheless, I find such arguments disingenuous and emblematic of the type of virtue-signaling that has permeated many of the recent public discussions surrounding the university's athletic programs. Accordingly, a little hardheaded realism is welcome. It would be great if the university could hire a coach for a couple of hundred thousand dollars per year. But could a program led by such a person fill the $288.5 million stadium we built not long ago and build the type of national brand that is necessary for a profit-turning football program?
Yes, I admit this argument rests on path dependency and that past mistakes do not justify present misdeeds. But to those who are upset about Fleck's salary, I ask them to put aside the outrage for a minute and follow their arguments to their logical conclusion. I ask them: What is the alternative? These are big questions, and they require big, complex discussions, not knee-jerk indignation.