How does one treat a wound? First and foremost, it needs to be cleaned and disinfected. Water, rubbing alcohol or another disinfectant is needed to destroy the bacteria that would otherwise cause infection and fester the cut. After the area is void of any potential problems that would aggravate the wound, the affected area should be kept dry and wrapped in a clean bandage. These bandages should be changed regularly until the wound is completely healed and life can continue uninhibited by the injury.
Hate speech, like a wound, needs to be properly treated and cured. It needs to be looked at, scrutinized, sutured up and, if need be, cut out of the body of society.
The current political climate should view hate speech as doctors should view an infected wound. However, instead of being cured through proper channels, it seems that hate speech, at an increasingly alarming rate, is merely being covered up by ineffective rules and regulations that do little to eliminate the root of hateful thought. One need only look at the policies of social-media sites or local colleges to see just how prevalent these sentiments truly are. "Safe spaces" do little to combat problematic thinking, creating only a void that pretends to have dealt with the problem of hate. On a similar note, the removal of posts and tweets from the eyes of someone's followers on social sites doesn't make those ideas go away and, ultimately, makes the user double down on his or her opinions instead. As well-intended as these actions are, they are ineffective. We congratulate ourselves, but nothing has been accomplished in the fight against hate.
Ideas, as egregious and offensive as they are, need to be confronted and beaten with sound logic and fact. Laws and rules do little to stem the tide of an individual's actions, as anyone who has ever enjoyed the company of cannabis, or even jaywalked, can attest to. Do I enjoy the fact that people are marginalized and hurt by the actions of others? Not in the slightest! I fear, however, the implications that arise when society allows hateful thought and prejudice to fester in the darkness, rather than exposing it to the light of day, in order for its despicable nature to be seen by all.
The system that we are progressing toward, one in which hate speech grows without being properly challenged, will unravel the work done by so many to combat the hate that lingers in so many minds. Only through open dialogue, with a free exchange of both good and bad ideas, does the ugliness of racism and sexism cease to exist.
Henry Rymer, Minneapolis
• • •
For a while there, I thought adding your name to a pretty darn necessary statement of tolerance might be a worthy idea ("Leaders' ad decries anti-Islam bigotry," Feb. 2). Silly me. The next day I read the letters and saw again the intolerance of many toward being tolerant ("Leaders' message painted good people with a broad brush," Feb. 3). Uh!? Nice try, Messrs. Dayton and Ellison and the rest of you who stick your neck out for public service. But there are those (yes, you knew this) who want to chop it off posthaste.
Dare we remind ourselves of William James (1842-1910): "A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."