Health insurance costs rise sharply this year

WASHINGTON - After modest increases last year, the cost of job-based health insurance for families and individuals has jumped sharply this year, even though insurers are paying less in benefits as cash-strapped American workers opt for less medical care.

For the estimated 150 million workers with employer-sponsored coverage, the average cost of family health insurance jumped 9 percent this year to $15,073, while the price of individual coverage rose 8 percent to $5,429.

Both increases are the largest since 2005. Each far outpaced a national 2 percent increase in wages and a 3.2 percent rise in inflation, according to an annual survey of nearly 2,100 businesses that the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust released Tuesday.

Premiums for family and individual coverage had increased only 3 percent and 5 percent, respectively, in last year's survey.

"We don't know if this is a one-time jump and premiums will go back down again next year or whether we're entering a period of higher increases. We really don't know, and we won't know until next year," said Drew Altman, the president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

What is clear, however, is that family coverage premiums have climbed 113 percent since 2001, compared with a 34 percent rise in workers' wages and a 27 percent increase in inflation over the period.

Employers still absorb the bulk of insurance costs. They pay an average of 72 percent, nearly $11,000, toward the cost of family coverage. Workers pay about 28 percent, an average of $4,129. For single coverage, workers pay about 18 percent, or $921, in premiums, while employers pay the rest, about $4,508.

The survey found that 31 percent of covered workers are in high-deductible plans, up from 10 percent in 2006.

Karen Ignagni, the president of America's Health Insurance Plans, said the increasing cost of medical care was the main culprit in the rate increases. Rising medical costs also helped pave the way for President Obama's 2010 Affordable Care Act, which overhauled the nation's health-care system.

But Altman said that this year's higher premiums, which were set last year, also might reflect insurers' expectation of a stronger economic recovery this year, with more patients presumably seeking more services.

Other insurers may have set rates higher this year thinking that the health law would increase their costs. But analysis by Kaiser and the federal government found that provisions in the new law enacted last year probably accounted for only 1 to 2 percentage points of this year's premium increases.

"In the end, both assumptions were wrong -- but insurance companies still charged high premiums and earned impressive profits," said a blog post Tuesday by Nancy-Ann DeParle, the White House deputy chief of staff.

That trend was reflected in a quarterly measurement of employer health care costs by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which came in at its lowest level in more than 10 years for the first half of 2011, according to DeParle.

Barclays Capital also reported that 13 of the 14 top health insurers beat their projected earnings for the first quarter, with profits averaging more than 46 percent higher than expected.

Ignagni, however, cited a report by Standard & Poor's that found health care costs covered by commercial insurance increased nearly 8 percent in the year that ended in July 2011. A May report by the independent consulting firm Milliman Inc. also found that the cost of care for a family of four covered in a preferred provider organization had increased 7.3 percent over 2010.

Ignagni said the premium increases simply reflected these trends. "It's the cost that's driving the numbers," she said.

In addition, Ignagni said, as more young, healthy workers have trouble finding employment and increasing numbers of these workers decline health coverage even when they do find jobs, the risk pool of covered employees grows "older and less healthy."