After having lunch with Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak and City Council President Barbara Johnson last week, and then having them as guests on the WCCO Sunday "Sports Huddle," I am convinced the two city leaders really are eager to work out a deal to have a Vikings stadium built in Minneapolis should the Arden Hills proposal fall through.
While Rybak and Johnson have been accused of not working to have the stadium built in Minneapolis until the Arden Hill project got hot, both deny this is the case.
"The Vikings and us have been talking about plans for downtown Minneapolis for about three or four years," said Rybak. "When [the Wilfs] came to town we met with them, we talked about redeveloping the Metrodome site. We've had discussions with them. [Vikings vice president] Lester Bagley was in a meeting with us the other day."
However, Bagley wasn't allowed to talk to Rybak about the stadium until very recently after the Wilf family became upset after Rybak announced a stadium plan the same day the Vikings announced Arden Hills as their favored site.
Rybak claims a stadium can be built on the Metrodome site for a lot less money than it can be in Arden Hills. And he said there are a couple of other site options on the table.
"Our original idea was to broaden the sales tax in Minneapolis and then also use part of our convention center tax and put those together into a pool," Rybak said. "It's important to remember that the convention center tax is a critically important tax for the state of Minnesota because Minneapolis every year generates more than $400 million in sales taxes to the state."
Rybak and Johnson claim they can gain support for the Vikings stadium in Minneapolis with their plan that also would enable them to take care of remodeling Target Center. Since that arena is supported by property taxes, their proposal would reduce those taxes in Minneapolis, something residents could support.
Johnson admits there is one big obstacle that the city will have to overcome: "We do have a charter, a requirement that if we spend more than $10 million, there needs to be a referendum."