In the public discussion of Minneapolis Police Department funding I have heard it said — including by both Council Member Jeremiah Ellison and Whittier resident Nicole Weiler — that funding the police is wasteful because "the police respond after an event occurs. They don't and won't keep us safe."
That is just plain wrong. Here's why.
Let me take you back to 1996, when the New York Times dubbed our city "Murderapolis." Violent crime was worse than today, but not much worse.
Addressing that crisis took resources, strategy and public support. Having been an MPD deputy chief in that moment, I can tell you the entire department pulled together with the community to turn the tide.
Resources: I oversaw the hiring of 110 so-called "Clinton Cops" in one year. We also invested in crime analysis, using both technology and professional analysts.
Strategy: Having police officers to deploy is inadequate if they are not deployed effectively. We adapted the New York CompStat initiative for Minneapolis and named it CODFOR (computer optimized deployment focused on results).
No, this was not "broken windows" policing. It was the opposite of that. Broken Windows was a blunt instrument, CODFOR was a scalpel. It involved understanding crime patterns and trends in real time, sharing that information internally and in the community, and using police resources in a very purposeful way. It emphasized accountability for results.
For example, we had a weekly meeting of a large number of key department personnel. It was led by command staff, but precinct commanders were the focus of accountability. They were expected to be aware of any current crime threats and have a strategy to address them. They were not left as scapegoats. They could tap the experience of other precinct commanders, crime analysts and investigators to guide the use of their police officers.