Readers offer ideas to improve farmland conservation

  • Updated: November 9, 2013 - 6:10 PM

Restoring wetlands and grasslands — as shown in this 2005 photo from McLeod County — benefits game and nongame wildlife.

Photo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service file photo,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

In response to dwindling grassland and wetland habitat in Minnesota, and the resulting loss of game and nongame wildlife, Dennis Anderson recently asked readers to forward suggestions how to improve farmland conservation in the state. Three of the many responses are published below. Have ideas of your own? Forward them to

Matt Spaniol, Elk River

I have never been a fan of food for fuel products. But a substitute for corn as a fuel source could be an answer that could create a positive outcome for wildlife, and also for the environment and farmers’ bottom lines.

Switch grass is just one example of cellulosic biomass that could be the nirvana for wildlife. As you know, the grass grows in these parts up to 5-7 feet, is harvested once a year, late in the season, and does not require fertilizing or replanting after the initial crop is harvested.

It’s a durable crop that is highly disease-resistant and an excellent source of nesting for wildlife. The cost of seed I understand is high, and perhaps state extension agencies should provide assistance. If the Legislature is not motivated, maybe groups such as Pheasants Forever or Ducks Unlimited can help. As a small-business owner (a one-man show), I must be proactive at all times. As a member of a broader group of outdoor enthusiasts we must take the matter into our own hands. Waiting for Congress, the Legislature, the DNR, or the Second Coming to effectively carve out a positive solution will not help.

I believe watching the outcomes at the various cellulosic plants in Iowa and Kansas is critical. I encourage you to study this issue and write about it. I think farmers might embrace the technology, assuming the outcomes are positive at the cellulosic processing plants and positive cash flow can be realized with biomass products such as switch grass. We know this, however: Farming is a for-profit enterprise, and until an alternative for row crops can be realized, these small business enterprises will continue to put land back into production, eliminating nesting sites, draining wetlands and producing pollutants into waterways.

Mike Roll, Lake Crystal

Local incentives and organization would be a good thing, as you suggested, Dennis, in your column. Example: We have created Crystal Waters Project ( for our local watershed in southern Minnesota. Our board of directors consists of lakeshore owners, farmers and local residents.

We are finding that local government agencies are listening to us. We have managed to install two gardens in the town of Lake Crystal, including a rain garden on the gutter downspout of City Hall. The other garden was installed during a benefit concert in one of the local parks to help prevent erosion into the local lake.

After these events we have been in contact with the local county agencies on a possible plan for a grant application for Legacy funding next year. We realize that these are small accomplishments for the scope of things. But people are talking about the problems with the lake now, which is more than what was happening before.

Mike Pankey, Lakeville

• Figure out a way to neutralize Roundup after it does its job in the field but before it gets into wetland systems that are surrounded by farm fields. Who would have a problem with that? I’m sure someone at 3M or another science-based, innovative company can figure that one out cost-effectively and unobtrusively.

• Kill carp in every wetland in the state. Offer a bounty similar to pocket gopher bounties. Turn the carp into fertilizer for sale from the state at a cheap price.

• Stock freshwater shrimp in every wetland in the state (much like Minnesota’s DNR stocks fish). Pretty cheap to do and waterfowl thrive on the invertebrates.

• Pick a number of wetlands (from the state’s detailed list) each year and dedicate Legacy money into restoring them. How about one in each county per year? And you shouldn’t have to write a thousand-page dissertation to get money from the Legacy fund. Just “dedicate” the money and do it.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Atlanta - LP: J. Teheran 2 FINAL
Philadelphia - WP: C. Hamels 9
Washington 0 FINAL
Miami 8
Boston 4 FINAL
Minnesota 4
Detroit 2 FINAL
Houston 3
Toronto - WP: C. Hynes 9 FINAL
Boston - LP: D. Hinojosa 7
Tampa Bay - WP: J. Norberto 3 FINAL
NY Yankees - LP: C. Whitley 0
St. Louis 5 FINAL
NY Mets 4
Los Angeles 4 FINAL
Kansas City 4
LA Angels 1 FINAL
Oakland 4
San Diego 8 FINAL
Chicago WSox 2
Chicago WSox 12 FINAL
Seattle 4
Cleveland 2 FINAL
San Francisco 5
Milwaukee 7 FINAL
Chicago Cubs 11
Arizona 3 FINAL
Cincinnati 0
Texas 4 FINAL
Colorado 10
Pittsburgh 3 FINAL
Baltimore 3
Detroit 78 FINAL
Charlotte 102
Philadelphia 93 FINAL
Washington 106
San Antonio 103 FINAL
Orlando 91
Indiana 87 FINAL
Boston 100
Brooklyn 100 FINAL
New York 98
Chicago 91 FINAL
Milwaukee 95
Dallas 135 FINAL
Oklahoma City 131
Sacramento 111 FINAL
Houston 115
Toronto 113 FINAL
Minnesota 99
Denver 84 FINAL
Utah 98
LA Clippers 126 4th Qtr 0:02
Portland 122
New Orleans 105 4th Qtr 3:25
LA Lakers 86
Toronto 3 FINAL
Buffalo 4
Philadelphia 4 FINAL
Pittsburgh 1
Edmonton 1 FINAL
Anaheim 5
Colorado 0 3rd Prd 15:09
San Jose 1
Loyola-Chicago 63 FINAL
ULM 62
Michigan 65
Temple 58 FINAL
West Virginia 66
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question