How to ... fine-tune your bow for optimal performance

  • Article by: BILL MARCHEL , Special to the Star Tribune
  • Updated: July 19, 2013 - 8:48 AM

Proper axle-to-axle distance varies from bow to bow. Manufacturer specification for the bow above is 40 inches.

Photo: Photos provided by Bill Marchel ,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

– Confidence is huge in most undertakings. This is especially true for the hunting archer. A close-range shot at, say, a big whitetail buck is especially unnerving. This is compounded if, well … your compound bow is out of shape.

If you haven’t had your bow-and-arrow combination looked at by an archery professional, late summer is the best time to do it. Minnesota’s archery deer season is only two months away.

So, that’s just what I did last week.

“The first thing we do is to check the bow for cracks or stress fractures,” said Scott Thesing, manager and pro staff technician at Archery Country in Brainerd. “We don’t want to get hurt, or have the bow blow up on somebody.”

After Thesing gave my bow the once over, he proceeded to check a few critical measurements. First he measured the axle-to-axle length. Then he checked the timing marks and brace height. These dimensions are specific to each manufacturer and bow model. The measurements on my bow were right on. Had my bow string or cables been stretched or worn, the problem would have shown up during the measurement process.

Next he checked for cam lean. Without getting too technical, a bow that displays cam lean generally has a problem with the Y-cables. My bow showed no cam lean.

“If a person shoots a lot, he or she should replace the string and cables on their bows once a year,” said Thesing. “Otherwise, every other year is fine.” I had my string and cables replaced late last summer.

Now it was time to actually shoot an arrow. Thesing performed what is called the “paper test.” He shot my bow-and-arrow combination several times through a sheet of paper placed at very close range, roughly three feet. This test not only determines whether my bow and arrow has the correct combination of draw weight, arrow length and arrow spine, it also determines whether there are problems with the placement of the arrow rest (on the bow) or the nocking point (on the bowstring).

Ideally, the arrow should penetrate the paper leaving a perfectly round hole. An elongated tear in any direction shows there is a problem. Adjustments can be made in several ways. If the arrow’s spine (or its stiffness) is too great or too light, an arrow with a different spine can be used. If the arrow’s spine is correct, then an adjustment of the arrow rest or nock point is in order.

My arrows were on the stiff side for my bow’s draw weight, a fact that revealed itself with a slightly elongated hole. Thesing tried an arrow with a different spine weight and was able to shoot perfect holes.

So, I left Archery Country with a dozen new arrows and a slightly thinner wallet. What’s important, though, is that I now know my bow and arrow combination are performing top-notch.

This fall, when, hopefully, I draw on that big whitetail buck, I’ll have complete confidence in my bowhunting equipment.

The rest will be up to me.

Bill Marchel, an outdoor writer and photographer, lives near Brainerd.

  • related content

  • Archers can test their bows by shooting paper targets at close range. Properly tuned bows will leave perfectly round holes.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Cleveland 86 FINAL
Indiana 93
Washington 81 FINAL
Philadelphia 89
Golden State 113 FINAL
Toronto 89
New York 121 FINAL
Detroit 115
Orlando 88 FINAL
Atlanta 95
Charlotte 98 FINAL
Boston 106
LA Clippers 97 FINAL
Memphis 79
Brooklyn 98 FINAL
Houston 102
Miami 102 FINAL
New Orleans 104
Minnesota 89 FINAL
Chicago 96
Utah 104 FINAL
Denver 82
San Antonio 107 FINAL
Sacramento 96
Milwaukee 93 FINAL
LA Lakers 101
Oklahoma City 112 FINAL
Portland 115
Boston 3 FINAL(OT)
New Jersey 2
Calgary 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 2
Washington 0 FINAL
Carolina 3
Chicago 0 FINAL
Tampa Bay 4
Colorado 5 FINAL(SO)
Dallas 4
Los Angeles 2 FINAL
Anaheim 4
Siena 63 FINAL
Quinnipiac 73
Harvard 49 FINAL
Cornell 57
Penn 69 FINAL
Brown 75
Fairfield 65 FINAL
Canisius 72
Manhattan 75 FINAL
Iona 79
Saint Peters 67 FINAL
Marist 69
Princeton 60 FINAL
Yale 81
Ohio 58 FINAL
Akron 70
Dartmouth 84 FINAL
Columbia 71
Valparaiso 56 FINAL
Cleveland State 53
Louisiana Tech 75 FINAL
Texas-El Paso 88
Seton Hall 77 FINAL
Xavier 60
Cornell 54 FINAL
Harvard 60
Yale 49 FINAL
(14) Princeton 67
Elon 51 FINAL
Drexel 54
Northeastern 47 FINAL
James Madison 82
St Johns 60 FINAL
Butler 49
Creighton 71 FINAL
Georgetown 62
Brown 58 FINAL
Penn 75
Columbia 50 FINAL
Dartmouth 60
Canisius 54 FINAL
Siena 58
St Josephs Brooklyn 35 FINAL
Western Carolina 86 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 80
Colorado 66 FINAL
Arizona 51
Southern Ill 72 FINAL
Bradley 66
Drake 59 FINAL
Wichita State 80
Indiana State 71 FINAL
Evansville 53
Illinois State 53 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 67
Northern Iowa 70 FINAL
Missouri State 72
Utah 42 FINAL
(10) Arizona State 46
Providence 62 FINAL
Villanova 71
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question