Lou Nanne Q&A: There's no reason U of M can't compete

  • Article by: DENNIS BRACKIN , Star Tribune
  • Updated: March 27, 2014 - 12:33 AM

Lou Nanne has heard the reasons why the U can’t compete and decided: Enough is enough.

University of Minnesota President Eric Kaler and athletic director Norwood Teague approached the state’s unofficial Mr. Hockey and school alum Lou Nanne late last year about becoming involved in the $190 million athletic facilities fundraising campaign.

“I said, ‘Definitely. I’d certainly love to be on your committee,’ ” Nanne responded. Kaler and Teague told him they had bigger plans, asking Nanne to chair the campaign.

Nanne reiterated his desire to be a committee member, only. The university officials persisted, and ultimately prevailed, thanks in part to Nanne’s memories of his grandfather.

“My grandfather used to have a word where, when I’d screw around and do things I shouldn’t be doing, he’d say, ‘Basta.’ B-A-S-T-A. That’s the Italian word for enough,” Nanne said. “Enough. I thought of that when they asked me. I said, ‘You know, I’ve had enough.’ I’ve had enough of hearing that the University of Minnesota can’t compete. I’ve had enough of hearing the University of Minnesota can’t recruit. I’ve had enough of hearing all these reasons why other places are going to succeed and we can’t.”

And so Nanne, at age 72, has taken on a role that he hopes will end the futility, especially in football, where the program’s last appearance in a major bowl was in 1962, by far the longest such drought of any Big Ten member. Nanne’s voice resonates with passion, leaving little doubt he’s the right man for the job because, well, he’s “a Gemini … with a lot of restless energy.”

He already has helped put in place an executive committee numbering 12 people, with room for two more, and a leadership group of 45. Nanne discussed his role in a wide-ranging interview last week at his downtown office — oh yes, he has a full-time job as Senior Managing Director for the global management asset arm of the Royal Bank of Canada.

“I’ve had the good fortune to follow the Gopher football team, and I’ve gone to these other places in the Big Ten, and I see these other places in the Big Ten and I say, ‘Why can they do it, and why can’t we?’ he said. “There’s no reason why we can’t. That’s why I got myself into this deal.”

That, and that word: Basta.

 

Q: Pretend I’m a potential donor. Tell me why this project is important and why I should contribute.

A: I think that everybody has looked at the University of Minnesota and just considered the people that donate to the University of Minnesota are alumni and the university is only involved with the alumni. Realistically speaking, the University of Minnesota is the engine that drives the state. … The University of Minnesota is the only research institution we have in the whole state, and we have to start looking at it as the jewel of the state — not just for the alumni.

 

Q: So you’re not just focused on the usual suspects, the alumni? You’re trying to expand the base of donors?

A: I don’t care if you went to Yale, Harvard, Stanford, Robert Morris, North Dakota State, whatever it is. If you’re living in the state of Minnesota, you’re benefiting from the University of Minnesota in some way … [Athletics] creates emotions, and it touches a lot of people. So you have all the different athletic things that we have here, sports that we have here, that makes it a better place for students to come. If you have better students, then you have better faculty, you get better educated people, you get better output from the total university and it makes the whole state benefit from it.

 

Q: I would imagine it’s easy to get a list of potential alumni donors, but how do you find the people you’re talking about to expand it? How do you know where to go?

A: That’s a great question, and that’s why we have the leadership council we have because there are people from different walks of life that all have different circles of friends and business involvement and they lead us to these other potential donors and that’s what we need.

 

Q: Where do you think Minnesota ranks in athletic facilities in the Big Ten?

A: [Big Ten Commissioner] Jim Delaney was just in town and met with my leadership council and he told us we’re last, which we knew. I’m not making it up. … I’m embarrassed by it, I’m embarrassed by the fact that we have so much going on in the state of Minnesota and we have great facilities for professional sports — which I love, I’m happy for that — but at the same time I see our students go and study in the hallways of Bierman, they don’t have enough room in the study hall, they’re eating on card tables and training tables, compared to the plush places these other schools have got. I see Northwestern raising $200 million for better facilities now. I see Texas A&M has [2012 Heisman Trophy winner] Johnny Manziel one year and they raise $550 million. I say, ‘What is this? We’re the state of Minnesota. This is our jewel.’

 

Q: So how did this happen? It didn’t happen overnight.

A: It was complacency. For too long, too often, we just took things as they are and no one really focused on the fact that we were falling behind. We just took things for granted and people don’t really realize when you’re successful in athletics, you raise more money for academics.

 

Q: There are going to be people that say Minnesota has competed well in many sports, especially the non-rev sports, and the key is the coach, not facilities. Why do we need it now?

A: First of all, non-rev sports are not going to drive the university. They’re not going to be able to exist if this continues. … We want to get to the position where we maintain what we’ve got in non-rev sports and continue to compete. … I’m a hockey guy but I’m not an idiot. I love hockey, but I know football is the most important athletic team at the University of Minnesota. The more successful they are, the more successful we are.

 

Q: What if you only get to $120 million? Then is it only just football, basketball, hockey facilities?

A: You know, if you have a goal and you don’t reach it, I don’t think you quit. You keep trying to get there. THERE’S AN OVERALL PLAN. One of the earliest things in this is the facilities to study and have training table, that’s for everybody.

 

Q: You and Teague must have some time frames in mind — where you’d like to be in a year, in two years.

A: No. I want to get it done tomorrow, can you help me? That’s it. … The faster we get something started and going, the more momentum we get, the more people we get on board, the more likely we are to succeed.

 

Q: You can break ground on some projects if, say, you get $50 million and then keep raising funds?

A: Right.

 

Q: There are prominent people who say that money is out of control in major college athletics, and will be the death of major sports. What’s your reaction to that?

A: Well first of all, I have to tell you one thing, they have been saying that for 20, 40 years, it doesn’t change. Everything goes up. … You don’t compete in the league and not give your athletes the opportunity to win. We are never going to be at the top of the spectrum for facilities and coaching salaries, etcetera. We don’t have 100,000-seat stadiums like Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, so we’re never going to have as much revenue. But there’s no reason for us to be at the bottom, and we’re at the bottom.

 

Q: Do you worry about major college athletics, where football coaches like Nick Saban make over $5 million?

A: But they take in $150 million [in revenue]. Be realistic. Why do a lot of salesman make more than the president of a company? Because they bring in business.

 

Q: Do you run into people who say why aren’t you raising money for academics?

A: Athletic success raises money for academics. The people have to start correlating that.

 

Q: How is it that in this state, with so many big corporations, raising money, at least athletically, has always been so difficult?

A: That’s the question that I think we’re trying to address. … I go to that little town in Ann Arbor and I see everything they got and I say, ‘What the hell is going on here?’… I personally think that the focus got away from the university when those pro sports teams came here, and we never got it turned back.

 

Q: And there wasn’t ever a solid fundraising plan?

A: That’s right, I don’t think there was a full-scale plan to get people involved. I really don’t think that “the ask” has been there. It’s like me, I never got involved in the University of Minnesota until the year 2000, I graduated in 1963. Someone came over and said, ‘Louie, we’d like you to be part of it, we’d like you to donate.’ I said, ‘Fine.’ And I got involved. They asked, ‘Why are you doing it now?’ I said, ‘Nobody ever asked me.’

 

Q: Are you optimistic of finding a major donor?

A: I am, but I wish you wouldn’t say major donor. We’re looking for $190 million, however we get it, not because of a major donor or donors. We don’t need a couple of top [donors] to be successful, but obviously it would make it easier.

 

Q: Are you satisfied where you are right now? What has the start been like?

A: Very encouraging because of the willingness of people to want to help. I’m really blown away. … I’m excited in the fact that people now finally realize we have to do something here to make this thing better.

 

Q: Do you have specific events planned to raise money?

A: You don’t get to $190 million by just fundraising events. You get to $190 million by people and corporations deciding, ‘I want to make this thing better for the state of Minnesota.’

 

Q: What’s your basic mode of raising money?

A: You see these things I have on? They’re called shoes, and it’s a lot of walking and talking.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Houston 2 FINAL
St. Louis 5
Washington 9 FINAL
Atlanta 8
Miami 5 FINAL
Boston 3
Minnesota 1 FINAL
Tampa Bay 2
NY Yankees 4 FINAL
Philadelphia 1
Baltimore 4 FINAL
Toronto 5
Detroit - LP: J. Mantiply 4 FINAL
NY Mets - WP: C. Torres 5
Cincinnati 5 FINAL
Chicago Cubs 2
Los Angeles 10 FINAL
Milwaukee 1
San Francisco 12 FINAL
Texas 3
Chicago WSox 0 FINAL
San Diego 5
Kansas City 11 FINAL
Cleveland 9
Seattle 4 FINAL
Los Angeles 7
Colorado 0 FINAL
LA Angels 3
Oakland 7 FINAL
Arizona 2
Pittsburgh 2 Top 4th Inning
NY Yankees 0
Chicago 42 3rd Qtr
Indiana 45
Sacramento 57 3rd Qtr
Orlando 68
Utah 41 3rd Qtr
Philadelphia 42
Miami 39 3rd Qtr
Washington 67
Toronto 42 3rd Qtr
Charlotte 53
Cleveland 21 2nd Qtr 11:30
Atlanta 36
Boston 0 1st Qtr 8:55
New Orleans 6
Detroit 4 1st Qtr 9:36
Houston 4
LA Lakers 4 1st Qtr 9:05
Memphis 6
Phoenix 9 1st Qtr 9:24
Brooklyn 3
Denver 7:30 PM
San Antonio
Dallas 9:30 PM
Golden State
Columbus 2 2nd Prd 13:41
New Jersey 1
Minnesota 1 2nd Prd 11:55
Carolina 0
Buffalo 2 1st Prd :56
Ottawa 0
Calgary 1 2nd Prd
Detroit 2
Edmonton 7:30 PM
Chicago
Pittsburgh 9:00 PM
Anaheim
Longwood 68 FINAL
Char Southern 60
Ark-Pine Bluff 94 FINAL
Miss Valley St 75
Southern Ill 45 FINAL
Wichita State 56
Winthrop 67 FINAL
Radford 66
Evansville 67 FINAL
Illinois State 71
Towson 69 1st OT 0:09
Elon 72
Gardner-Webb 72 1st OT 0:04
High Point 71
Samford 76 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 81
Northern Ill 22 2nd Half 19:08
Ball State 27
Bowling Green 35 2nd Half
Buffalo 35
Brown 43 2nd Half 15:54
Dartmouth 24
Toledo 33 2nd Half 15:53
Eastern Mich 40
Akron 36 2nd Half 15:46
Kent State 43
Ill-Chicago 38 2nd Half 16:24
Oakland 32
Miami-Ohio 34 2nd Half 15:31
Ohio 62
Columbia 17 2nd Half 15:22
Penn 29
Cornell 33 2nd Half 15:03
Princeton 41
Central Mich 26 2nd Half 17:26
Western Mich 41
Bradley 32 2nd Half 16:26
Northern Iowa 34
Morehead State 29 1st Half 2:56
Murray State 36
UNC-Asheville 7:00 PM
Coastal Carolina
Yale 2 1st Half 17:01
Harvard 3
Furman 7:30 PM
Citadel
Coll of Charleston 7:30 PM
Drexel
Texas Tech 8:00 PM
Baylor
Pacific 8:00 PM
San Francisco
Detroit 8:30 PM
Cleveland State
Belmont 8:30 PM
Eastern Ky
Loyola-Chicago 8:35 PM
Indiana State
Loyola Marymount 10:30 PM
Santa Clara
Chicago 9:00 PM
Los Angeles
Saint Louis 63 FINAL
(21) George Washington 77
Wake Forest 68 FINAL
(16) Duke 77
Furman 55 FINAL
(17) Chattanooga 68
Monmouth 61 FINAL
Quinnipiac 82
Michigan State 60 FINAL
(4) Maryland 70
Belmont 65 FINAL
UT Martin 71
Arkansas 36 FINAL
(3) South Carolina 58
Mercer 56 FINAL
East Tenn St 66
Richmond 45 FINAL
Fordham 46
Miami-Florida 61 FINAL
(2) Notre Dame 77
Siena 61 FINAL
Iona 71
Washington St 48 FINAL
(9) Arizona State 67
Ark-Pine Bluff 63 FINAL
Miss Valley St 51
(23) Rutgers 57 FINAL
(24) Northwestern 62
Tennessee St 71 FINAL
SIU-Edwardsville 59
Loyola Marymount 50 FINAL
Gonzaga 70
(18) Texas A&M 65 FINAL
LSU 71
Cincinnati 76 FINAL
UCF 66
Saint Josephs 61 FINAL
Dayton 80
UCLA 62 FINAL
(19) Stanford 67
Santa Clara 42 FINAL
San Diego 51
Virginia Tech 43 FINAL
(7) Florida State 82
SMU 59 FINAL
Memphis 71
Lehigh 75 FINAL
Holy Cross 62
Rhode Island 34 2nd Half 12:56
Duquesne 38
North Florida 19 2nd Half 14:30
(20) Fla Gulf Coast 41
Kennesaw St 34 2nd Half 15:12
Jacksonville 35
USC Upstate 21 2nd Half 14:57
Northern Ky 25
Lipscomb 37 2nd Half 15:00
Stetson 59
Nebraska 38 2nd Half 15:39
(14) Iowa 46
Saint Peters 37 2nd Half 13:27
Marist 33
Navy 36 2nd Half 13:55
Bucknell 31
Lafayette 31 2nd Half 14:10
American Univ 52
Colgate 21 2nd Half 14:18
Army 23
Georgia 16 2nd Half 16:17
(5) Tennessee 39
Dartmouth 52 2nd Half 11:08
Brown 39
Penn 29 2nd Half 15:22
Columbia 18
(13) Princeton 62 2nd Half 7:59
Cornell 27
Kansas 20 2nd Half 15:53
Kansas State 31
Harvard 49 2nd Half 9:55
Yale 51
(15) North Carolina 7:00 PM
(10) Louisville
Houston 7:00 PM
Tulane
San Jose St 5 1st Half 18:35
UNLV 0
Utah State 8:00 PM
Colorado State
Colorado 8:00 PM
(8) Oregon State
New Mexico 8:00 PM
Wyoming
Minnesota 8:25 PM
Ohio State
(12) Kentucky 8:25 PM
(11) Miss State
San Diego State 8:30 PM
Nevada
Niagara 8:30 PM
Fairfield
Texas Tech 8:30 PM
West Virginia
Boise State 9:00 PM
Fresno State
Washington 10:30 PM
California
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Who is the best center on a Twin Cities sports team?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close