Previous Page 2 of 3 Next

Continued: New U President Eric Kaler: Q & A

  • Article by: CHIP SCOGGINS and DENNIS BRACKIN , Star Tribune staff writers
  • Last update: August 24, 2011 - 6:42 AM

Q: What will your role be in Gophers athletics?

Kaler: I'm a big fan. I think college athletics is an important part of college life. I think it's an important part of the institution's reputation. And I think it's an important part of how people see us. So I'm excited about the range of sports teams we have. I'm excited about the successes we've had and I'm looking forward to having some more of those.

Q: When you look at college athletics, it's obviously been a tough 12 months with the scandals and negative headlines. What changes in your mind need to be done to clear up some of the off-the-field problems we're seeing.

Kaler: I think the commissioner of the SEC said it first: Whatever veneer was papered over these activities is gone. So it's really important that we look realistically at what's going on. Frankly it's the presidents and the chancellors of the universities who own this problem and that means we own the fix. We need to move aggressively forward to change the status quo. There are a variety of proposals that came out of that [NCAA] presidents meeting -- simplifying the rulebook, being realistic about what student-athletes can and can't do. I'm 100 percent behind those efforts. We're going to have to move to a situation where the rules are understandable and where we enforce them rigorously and we hold the student-athletes and boosters to high standards.

Q: Some people think paying athletes is the way to go. Are you in favor of paying athletes or maybe giving a stipend so they get a full-cost scholarship?

Kaler: I'm open to that discussion. But I will tell you, as I'm sure you know, an athlete on a full-ride scholarship has all of those expenses covered, and for students with financial need, they're eligible for Pell Grants and the maximum Pell Grant is up to $5,500. It's not clear to me that that's not enough compensation for a student-athlete to have. But again, I'm two months into this job, so I'm going to look and listen some more about what the best path there is. But I'm certainly open to the discussion.

Q: Are there any proposals that you've read or heard that jumped out at you and intrigue you?

Kaler: Not beyond the rulebook simplification. That clearly needs to get done. I think the debate about providing a stipend in addition to the scholarship is something to think about. But again for students from some economic backgrounds, they don't need that money. They're fine. I think having a need-based measure is probably a better way to do it.

Q: Some would argue that college athletics is already operating as a semi-pro model and that the next step -- getting rid of all rules -- is the way to go.

Kaler: I don't think that's actually true. I think a lot of programs function with a high degree of integrity. I think the rigorous structure that enables a high-quality college athletic program -- which means the student-athletes advance, which means the coaching staffs and the boosters are ethical and act appropriately and that has success on the field or court -- I think that's an attainable goal. I think that's a goal for the University of Minnesota. I'm not anxious to split off and go semi-pro. I would not want to do that.

Q: Presidents have different degrees of participation in the NCAA. How involved do you want to be?

Kaler: I want to be involved. As I said, I think athletics is an important part of the institutional effort. I do want to be involved in setting policy. But on the other hand, I'm not sending in plays from the sidelines. I have an athletic director and a coaching staff and their job is to run our athletic program.

Q: What is Joel Maturi's status?

Kaler: Joel is in the same situation as all of my senior managers. I'm evaluating their role, their effectiveness. As we move into the fall, I'll be making judgments about all my senior managers, including Joel.

Q: You were asked when you first got here whether Joel will finish out his contract and you said that you were taking 90 days. Basically no comment. Joel has a contract through June. Will he be here through June?

Kaler: I'm in my listening and learning and evaluating point of time. I'll make decisions about all my senior managers as we go into the fall.

Q: So you're not prepared to say yes, he will serve out the final year?

Kaler: I'm not making a comment about any of my senior managers' situation.

Q: When you say evaluating, are you talking to people outside the athletic department? Joel is a polarizing figure among fans and some former athletes. Do you talk to them too, or is it people inside the athletic department and your conversations with Joel?

Kaler: When I'm looking at any senior manager, I'm talking to people in the organization and outside the organization.

Q: Has Joel indicated whether he wants to finish his contract?

Kaler: To me? No. But he hasn't indicated that he doesn't want to finish his contract. That's sort of where I am. I'm evaluating him and we will have some conversations and we'll chart a path forward. But he is under contract through the end of June. Do I expect him to finish? I would expect him to finish it, sure. But we haven't had that discussion.

Q: Are you in favor of alcohol returning to campus sporting events.

Kaler: I think it's appropriate that we sell alcohol in the premium sections. I do not want to sell alcohol in the student sections.

Q: Is that something that could happen quickly?

Kaler: We're going to advance that conversation, absolutely, because that would put us in line with other college athletic venues around the country. It's an appropriate place for us to be and it's an appropriate way to handle the alcohol issue.

Q: The university's financial commitment toward the athletic department has gone down significantly under Joel. I think it's $1.8 million this year. Would you like the department to become self-supportive or do you still see some need to have that [financial contribution].

Kaler: We'll make budget decisions around athletics in the context of the overall university. As you know, the state's support for the university has been hammered. That requires us to look carefully at everything we do. Certainly the support for the athletic department has decreased. Support for a lot of our academic programs has decreased. On the academic side, people are needing to be more entrepreneurial, needing to be more creative on how they manage their budgets and creative on sources of revenue. The athletics department is in exactly the same situation. I am encouraging them to be more entrepreneurial, to look at ways to reduce costs, because the state dollars are just not there. They'll have to become increasingly frugal. I can't make a prediction on which way that state aid percentages is going to go, but it's hard to imagine it's going to go up.

Q: Your budget at Stony Brook was about $17 million. This one is $78 million. How different does that make your oversight of athletics?

Kaler: That is, whatever it is, four times bigger. This is a bigger university than Stony Brook was in lots of dimensions. But it's not qualitatively different. We're a Division I school, we had a focus on integrity and a focus on success on the field. Those are exactly the same things that we have here. The fact that we have more sports and a bigger budget doesn't really change much in terms of fundamentally how you do it.

Q: Stony Brook was a different financial model. You didn't have the revenue coming in from TV and gate receipts. A lot of student fees went into athletics. Having come from that model are you more open to considering things like student fees for athletics?

Kaler: I think moving to a student fee structure is a tough lift. We're asking our students right now to pay substantial tuition. Room and board costs, book costs are high. The cost of attendance is a big number and I'd have a hard time of putting an additional burden on the student body in terms of an athletic fee or really any non-academic fee whatsoever, so that's not a direction I'd like to go. ... Stony Brook's tuition is remarkably low. Stony Brook's tuition is $5,000 a year. That puts the fee structure in an entirely different part of the conversation.

Q: When you look at the budget and the struggles, Joel has been adamant about having a well-rounded, 25-sport program, and the non-revenue sports mean as much as the big sports. Going forward, do you still see this university being able to support 25 sports the way that it has?

Kaler: As we go forward, we're going to look with a microscope at everything we do. One thing we will look at is the scope of the athletic department. I expect to look carefully at what those revenue models look like for the full spectrum of sports.

Q: Does that mean you're open to cutting sports? Is that an option that's on the table?

Kaler: I think it's going to be important for the athletics department, just like every other part of the university, to critically evaluate what they're doing with the funds that they have available. If they can support 25 sports in the budget parameters that they have, that's terrific. But if they can't, then we'll need to go in a different direction, which means we need to have fewer sports.

Q: One of the criticisms of Joel from the fan base is that he's so supportive of the broad-based athletic program. There's a group of diehard fans, even former Gophers football players, who say Joel should take more money and put it into football and basketball and make those high-profile winning programs, and whatever that does to the non-revenues, let the chips fall where they may. What's your view?

Kaler: That [sentiment] is absolutely out there. I fully hear that point of view. As we go forward and look at the department I think that's a conversation internally that the department needs to have. Do they need more money in the revenue sports to be competitive? Maybe, maybe not. Again, if you look at where we are in our football budget, it's a big number. I think that's a number that's probably big enough to win in the Big Ten.

Q: When you look at football, men's basketball and men's hockey, the top three sports are having a tough time right now. Do you have a sense of what needs to be done to get those programs going in the right direction? Is it more money or something else?

Kaler: I think the football direction is right now a very good one. I haven't met a person in Minnesota who doesn't think Jerry Kill is a terrific addition to Minnesota football. I'm very optimistic that he's going to have success on the field and I'm optimistic he's going to move the academic progress rate to where it needs to be. Right now, he's in a great honeymoon period, as am I. Basketball and hockey have established coaches. Challenging times lately but I know they're optimistic about the future for their teams.

Q: How important is to you to have winning programs in these high-profile sports?

Kaler: It's absolutely critical to me to have high performing programs. What that means is that they have to be making appropriate academic progress. They have to be following the rules and having athletic success. But to me the most important thing is the integrity of the program. I think you can win with integrity and I think we've got the structure in place to win with integrity.

Q: Minnesota has made some improvements, but it continues to lag in graduation rates in football and basketball in the Big Ten. Have you looked enough to know what changes need to be made?

Kaler: I haven't looked enough at the drivers, but I know when you have a lot of turnover in coaching staff that tends to impact graduation rates. We've had obviously some turnover in the football program. I do know that the way our athletic department is organized, in terms of academic reporting and enforcement reporting and athletic activity, is a terrific model. That's a rock-solid foundation on which to build. And I think continuity in coaching staff will drive student performance and athletic performance and graduation rates.

Q: President Bruininks talked about one of his goals was to raise the academic profile of incoming football and basketball players on the same course as the student body. What is your view on admitting high school students where their academic profile is lower?

Kaler: I think we are a source of opportunity for a variety of students. We will make exceptional admits for students with a range of different kinds of abilities if we think they can be successful at the University of Minnesota. Whether they're performance students or athletes, we'll provide a structure and enable them to succeed. What I will not tolerate is a rotating door in which we bring in students that we know will fail, exploit them athletically and then let them go. That's completely unacceptable to me.

Q: Doesn't some of that fall back on the institutional support? If you're going to take some at-risk students, you need to have the academic support in place to help them.

Kaler: If you admit a student, that student has to project to succeed academically at the university or you're doing that student an enormous disservice. Frankly, I don't think that's an ethical thing for a program to do.

Q: What is the status of the basketball practice facility and baseball stadium?

Kaler: I know those are the two projects we need. I know we're in the middle of fundraising for them. But I don't have a up-to-date number on where we are in terms of fundraising either of those projects.

Q: How important are those two projects?

Kaler: I think we want to have an athletic program that's effective and competitive in the Big Ten and I'm told those facilities are needed for our teams to be competitive. So I'm supportive of moving forward on those. Again, those are facilities that will come from fundraising and from philanthropy. We're not taking money away from our academic programs to fund those.

Q: What is your athletic background? Did you play sports as a kid?

Kaler: I ran cross country when I was in high school. Not very quickly. But that was it. Played intramural sports. But no serious athletic background.

Q: People refer to you as a university president who is "pro athletics." Where does that come from?

Kaler: I think in the interview process I was asked, 'What do you think about college athletics?' I'm a fan. I think it's an important part of the university. I'm proud of what we do and want to do it cleanly, ethically and successfully.

Q: You addressed the football team before the season and told them, if you screw up, you're going to be on the front page of the paper. Is that something where you're not going to have much tolerance for?

Kaler: I do believe in forgiveness and redemption. But we have a lot of structure in place for these student-athletes so I firmly believe they know what the rules are, and if they break those rules, they should expect there to be consequences.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Golden State 99 FINAL
Cleveland 110
Oklahoma City 16 2nd Qtr 11:41
Phoenix 25
Vancouver 3 FINAL
Buffalo 6
Arizona 3 FINAL
NY Rangers 4
Montreal 5 FINAL
Columbus 2
Philadelphia 2 FINAL
Toronto 3
Chicago 3 FINAL
Florida 0
St. Louis 2 FINAL(SO)
Winnipeg 1
Minnesota 4 FINAL
Nashville 2
Ottawa 0 1st Prd :16
Los Angeles 0
Detroit 0 2nd Prd
San Jose 1
Northern Ky 78 FINAL
Kennesaw St 53
East Tenn St 73 FINAL
Citadel 74
Winthrop 50 FINAL
Campbell 65
Delaware 58 FINAL
Drexel 44
Jacksonville St 57 FINAL
Eastern Ky 63
Northeastern 65 FINAL
Elon 72
Sacred Heart 90 FINAL
Fair-Dickinson 85
Western Carolina 49 FINAL
Furman 53
Char Southern 81 FINAL
Gardner-Webb 91
Western Ill 66 FINAL
Nebraska Omaha 73 FINAL
IUPU-Ft Wayne 67
Radford 69 FINAL
Liberty 80
St Francis-NY 74 FINAL
Long Island 69
Wofford 76 FINAL
Mercer 72
Minnesota 96 FINAL
Michigan State 90
High Point 75 FINAL
UNC-Asheville 71
Samford 67 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 81
Nebraska 57 FINAL
Ohio State 81
Wagner 59 FINAL
Robert Morris 91
Mount St Marys 60 FINAL
St Francis-PA 63
Houston 54 FINAL
Temple 66
Vanderbilt 73 FINAL
Tennessee 65
Chattanooga 86 FINAL
Va Military 82
Milwaukee 61 FINAL
Wright State 58
Coastal Carolina 69 FINAL
Presbyterian 80
Central Conn St 69 FINAL
Bryant 77
Ga Southern 77 FINAL
Appalachian St 58
SIU Edwardsville 61 FINAL
Austin Peay 64
Green Bay 72 FINAL
Ill-Chicago 67
Texas-El Paso 60 FINAL
Louisiana Tech 77
Marshall 87
Rider 63 FINAL
Monmouth 60
Eastern Ill 57 FINAL
Murray State 65
Charlotte 65 FINAL
North Texas 81
North Dakota St 58 FINAL
Oral Roberts 74
Old Dominion 63 FINAL
Rice 54
TX-San Antonio 66 FINAL
Southern Miss 70
UT Martin 69 FINAL
Tennessee St 52
Fla Atlantic 68 FINAL
Western Ky 71
Northern Ariz 85 FINAL
North Dakota 75
Grand Canyon 70 FINAL
Chicago State 74
Utah Valley U 50 FINAL
South Alabama 57
Texas-Arlington 80 FINAL
Arkansas State 81
Georgia State 83 FINAL
Ark-Little Rock 92
Troy 61 FINAL
Texas State 67
Arizona 82 FINAL
Colorado 54
Memphis 57
Tenn Tech 73 FINAL
Morehead State 86
Rutgers 85 FINAL
Purdue 92
Southern Utah 67 FINAL
Northern Colorado 77
Montana State 68 FINAL
Eastern Wash 92
UC Davis 49 2nd Half 9:49
UC Santa Barbara 53
UC Irvine 57 2nd Half 9:05
Cal Poly 42
Cal State Fullerton 53 2nd Half 11:10
CS-Northridge 52
Montana 39 2nd Half 14:13
Idaho 35
BYU 44 2nd Half 14:37
Portland 46
Pacific 45 2nd Half 8:24
Santa Clara 38
Arizona State 9 2nd Half
Utah 41
San Diego 7 1st Half 13:04
Gonzaga 7
St Marys-CA 18 1st Half 11:16
San Francisco 8
Oregon State 11 1st Half 13:49
Stanford 7
Long Beach State 10:59 PM
Rice 68 FINAL
Old Dominion 83
Manhattan 67 FINAL
Monmouth 84
Georgia Southern 39 FINAL
Appalachian St 66
Marshall 74 FINAL
FIU 50
TX-Arlington 62 FINAL
Arkansas State 67
South Alabama 38
Troy 75 FINAL
Texas State 59
Georgia State 39 FINAL
Ark-Little Rock 56
William & Mary 84 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 55
Delaware 68 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Maine 61
UMass Lowell 72 FINAL
Vermont 64
Albany 65 FINAL
Hartford 50
Stony Brook 68 FINAL
Binghamton 59
Boston College 60 FINAL
(8) Louisville 77
(23) Syracuse 60 FINAL
Clemson 55
(16) Duke 62 FINAL
Georgia Tech 71
Florida 53 FINAL
Alabama 49
NC State 52 FINAL
(9) Florida State 72
Miami-Florida 59 FINAL
Wake Forest 60
Ole Miss 58
(11) Miss State 50 FINAL
(2) South Carolina 69
Fairfield 74 FINAL
Iona 62
Marist 58 FINAL
Saint Peters 66
Quinnipiac 91 FINAL
Rider 53
Virginia 70 FINAL
(15) North Carolina 72
Pittsburgh 59 FINAL
(4) Notre Dame 87
Ohio State 88 FINAL
Penn State 70
Massachusetts 60 FINAL
Dayton 69
(22) George Washington 81 FINAL
Richmond 69
Saint Louis 53 FINAL
Rhode Island 68
Wright State 74 FINAL
Detroit 59
Green Bay 70 FINAL
Oakland 55
Western Ky 85 FINAL
Florida Atlantic 74
Indiana 72 FINAL
(5) Maryland 83
North Texas 46 FINAL
Charlotte 71
Central Arkansas 64 FINAL
Sam Houston St 56
SE Louisiana 60 FINAL
Northwestern St 71
Nicholls 63 FINAL
New Orleans 68
Incarnate Word 44 FINAL
Stephen F Austin 58
Denver 68 FINAL
No Dakota State 87
IUPU-Ft Wayne 61 FINAL
Nebraska Omaha 70
South Dakota 69
Lamar 77 FINAL
McNeese State 98
Western Ill 49 FINAL
South Dakota St 69
Missouri 70 FINAL
(12) Texas A&M 69
(13) Kentucky 56 FINAL
Arkansas 51
(20) Rutgers 60 FINAL
(25) Northwestern 80
Southern Miss 61 FINAL
TX-San Antonio 59
Wisconsin 74 FINAL
(17) Iowa 78
North Dakota 68 FINAL
Northern Ariz 72
Northern Colorado 88 FINAL
Southern Utah 66
Louisiana Tech 0 Postponed
Texas-El Paso 0
Eastern Washington 53 FINAL
Montana State 63
Idaho 68 FINAL
Montana 81
Auburn 70 FINAL
Vanderbilt 58
(6) Tennessee 70 FINAL
Georgia 59
Gonzaga 62 FINAL
San Diego 75
Washington 60
Portland 63 FINAL
BYU 65
(24) California 74 FINAL
Oregon 59
(19) Stanford 69 FINAL
(7) Oregon State 58
Chicago State 49 FINAL
Grand Canyon 73
Utah Valley U 61
San Francisco 65 FINAL
St Marys-CA 62
UCLA 57 2nd Half 10:34
Washington St 61
Santa Clara 48 2nd Half 10:41
Pacific 62
CS-Northridge 48 2nd Half 11:45
Cal State Fullerton 38
UC Santa Barbara 29 2nd Half 7:21
Cal-Irvine 43
Hawaii 31 2nd Half 10:17
Long Beach St 34
Cal Poly 54 2nd Half 9:35
UC Davis 34
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Who is the best center on a Twin Cities sports team?

Weekly Question