As reporters, we would all give anything to be that proverbial fly on the wall, to hear all the non-politically correct, “real talk” that goes on behind the scenes when a bunch of talent evaluators meet before big decisions.
I’d love to know exactly what’s said in Wild assistant General Manager Brent Flahr’s war room when the scouts compile a draft list. I’d love to be in GM Chuck Fletcher’s end-of-the-year evaluation meetings to hear what the Wild brass truly thinks of its own players and potential available ones.
I’d love to know exactly what was said in the coach’s office before Mike Yeo and Fletcher tossed Zenon Konopka on waivers. I’d love to be hiding behind a book case to hear owner Craig Leipold’s uncensored opinions after a loss. I’d love to understand exactly how the Wild determines when to call on Jason Zucker to drive up and down, as one fan dubbed on Twitter, the “Zucker Expressway.”
On Wednesday, ESPN.com’s Scott Burnside published a fascinating behind-the-scenes, fly-on-the-wall peek into the USA Hockey’s deliberation process for the 2014 men’s Olympic team in Sochi next month.
Burnside was embedded in the selection process from beginning to end, and his piece included some brutally honest inside looks into how the team was determined.
The brashest comments, unsurprisingly, came from 2010 GM Brian Burke, the director of player personnel this time around.
Burke, who was Anaheim’s GM when the Ducks drafted Bobby Ryan second overall behind Sidney Crosby in 2005, was critical of Ryan in the evaluation process.
From Burnside’s article, Burke said: “I think we have to know what we’re taking with Bobby. He’s a passive guy. He is not intense. That word is not in his vocabulary. It’s never going to be in his vocabulary. He can’t spell intense.”
Ryan, now with the Senators, wasn’t named to his second Olympic team. He was understandably embarrassed, telling Ottawa reporters: “I almost feel degraded. … The guy that drafted you, the guy that stood behind you and helped you get into the league and did a lot right by you, so I thought he thought more of me as a player than that.”
It is interesting, because in 2010, Burke told me before the Olympics: “I believe you’ve got to give credit where credit is due, and Chuck Fletcher is the guy. When he was on our staff in Anaheim, Chuck Fletcher is the guy that pushed hardest for Bobby Ryan, not me. What he’s turned into, Chuck Fletcher deserves the credit.”
At the time, I thought that to be a compliment. In hindsight, maybe it wasn’t, although USA Olympic GM David Poile, who “apologizes as much as I can” to Ryan, says Burke is a big fan of his former goal-scorer and had him on his final roster submission.
Some fans and reporters have accused Burke of being “classless” for the comments.
But like it or not, these are the real conversations that go on when you are on a committee tasked with trying to assemble the best combination of 25 players that will give the United States the best chance of winning a gold medal.
Every player’s strengths and weaknesses are discussed positively and critically.
The fly-on-the-wall piece told us that Burke was “not a big [Dustin] Byfuglien guy,” that Poile believed there’s “something missing with Jack [Johnson] this year,” that Keith Yandle’s lack of defensive wherewithal makes Burke think “disaster” might strike any moment and that the committee believed Jason Pominville and Kyle Okposo weren’t built for the international ice sheet.
“I would think the bigger ice would help me, if anything,” the Wild’s Pominville said. “But that’s their decision.”
Yes, it is. There’s a lot of heartache that goes into every hockey decision, and the behind-the-scenes talk is usually candid, brash and not normally quoted by reporters.
Burke wasn’t being classless. He was doing what goes on in an evaluation process.