Poll finds most Americans oppose even limited strike
Only 1 in 5 Americans believe that not responding to chemical weapons attacks in Syria would embolden other rogue governments, rejecting the heart of a weeks-long White House campaign for U.S. military strikes, an Associated Press poll concluded Monday.
The survey of 1,007 adults nationwide found that most Americans oppose even a limited attack on Syria despite Obama administration warnings that inaction would risk national security and ignore a gruesome humanitarian crisis. And a slim majority — 53 percent — say they fear that a strike would lead to a long-term U.S. military commitment in Syria.
The survey reflects a U.S. public that is tired of Mideast wars after a dozen years of military action in Iraq and Afghanistan. It undercuts political support Obama is hoping to garner as he seeks congressional authorization this week to strike the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Released Monday, the poll was conducted Sept. 6-8 by GfK Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved land line and cellphone interviews with 1,007 adults across the country. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points; it is larger for subgroups.
IS IT SYRIA OR OBAMA? GOP LEANS ANTI-WAR
The Republican Party may be turning antiwar.
Some of the shift is driven by visceral distrust of President Obama, who has been proposing military strikes against Syria. Some is driven by remorse and the Iraq war. And some is fed by the isolationist and libertarian strains of the grass-roots Tea Party movement.
Plenty of Republicans, including key congressional leaders, support Obama's push for military action against the Syrian regime for allegedly using chemical weapons.
But among constituents, rank-and-file members of Congress and many in the party's echo chamber, the trend is decidedly antiwar.