Workplace wellness programs — efforts to get workers to lose weight, eat better, stress less and sleep more — are an $8 billion industry in the U.S.
Most large employers offer some type of wellness program — with growth fueled by incentives in the federal Affordable Care Act.
But no one has been sure they work.
Now researchers from the University of Chicago and Harvard have published one of the first large-scale studies that employs more sophisticated research techniques.
They randomly assigned 20 BJ's Wholesale Club outlets to offer a wellness program to all employees, then compared results with 140 stores that did not. The big-box retailer employed nearly 33,000 workers across all 160 clubs during the test.
After 18 months, it turned out that yes, workers participating in the wellness programs self-reported healthier behavior, such as exercising more or managing their weight better than those not enrolled.
But the efforts did not result in differences in health measures, such as improved blood sugar or glucose levels; how much employers spent on health care; or how often employees missed work, their job performance or how long they stuck around in their jobs.
"The optimistic interpretation is there is no way we can get improvements in health or more efficient spending if we don't first have changes in health behavior," said one study author, Katherine Baicker, dean of the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago. "But if employers are offering these programs in hopes that health spending and absenteeism will go down, this study should give them pause."