We are looking at a new dust-up in the retirement universe. Is 70 the new 65? Or is 35 the magic number?
TV personality Suze Orman says don't dream about retiring a minute before you hit 70, while Twitter showman and blogger "Mr. Money Mustache," aka Pete Adeney, is promoting a lifestyle through the FIRE movement — which stands for "Financial Independence, Retire Early" — which might enable you to leave your day job by your 30s or 40s.
Magic numbers do drive blogs and podcasts. The theory that you can take control of your money — as well as your time and energy — so that you can ultimately walk away from the rat race is hugely appealing.
And I would imagine that the FIRE movement isn't hurt by the incredible steady returns for the stock market in the past few years.
Yet is it really possible to save 40 percent or 50 percent of your pay toward retirement when you are in your 20s or 30s? And live debt-free as early as possible? Maybe, if you are extraordinarily frugal and live an extremely modest lifestyle.
The whole focus of the movement is to get out of a work-to-buy, spend-to-save culture. It's not easy, even on a small scale. You would need an even bigger level of savings because if you stop working in your 40s, you are not going to be building up a significant retirement benefit from Social Security, said David Blanchett, head of retirement research for Morningstar Investment Management in Chicago.
While some might be able to retire earlier, plenty of people aren't able to do that. "Like everything else, there's no one number for everyone," Blanchett said.
One guideline suggests you need 10 times the last year of your salary saved for retirement if you're retiring in your 60s. To retire in your 30s or 40s, some suggest, you might need to save up 30 times or more of your living expenses before you retire. If you're spending $40,000 a year, that's $1.2 million.