Historically, ruffed grouse have been Minnesota's most popular game bird, measured by the number of hunters who pursue it and total of birds harvested.
That has changed some in recent decades, as peak populations of grouse have declined, with hunter numbers flagging proportionately.
Grouse numbers rise and fall in approximate 10-year cycles that aren't very well understood but likely are linked, at least in part, to the quality and quantity of available food. Habitat variations, how wet or dry a given spring nesting season is, winter snowfall amounts, disease prevalence and predator abundance also affect grouse populations.
Now the primary conservation group that advocates for ruffed grouse, the Ruffed Grouse Society (RGS) and American Woodcock Society (AWS), headquartered in Pennsylvania, has made dramatic changes to the way it operates, with a goal of significantly increasing ruffed grouse and woodcock habitat nationwide.
The group's new direction, over time, might help boost Minnesota grouse populations. But developing and/or improving grouse habitat on a landscape scale is challenging. Timber must be cut, markets for the timber must be available or developed, and cuttings must be continual enough and sufficiently executed so that different age classes of the "right" kinds of trees are arranged in relative proximity.
Another challenge is that wingshooters in Minnesota and elsewhere traditionally haven't supported grouse the way they support, say, pheasants.
Example: Some 22,000 Minnesotans belong to Pheasants Forever, while only 2,670 state hunters are Ruffed Grouse Society members. (RGS membership nationwide is 15,000.)
Yet grouse supporters have habitat-making advantages that pheasant advocates and others don't. Every time a logger cuts timber in grouse country, for instance, he makes habitat that benefits ruffed grouse.