I feel I must respond to the commentary by Mary Christine Bader in the paper on May 15 ("In Mideast, U.S. subsidizes apartheid and apocalypse," Opinion Exchange). It is almost impossible to try to understand her logic in stating that the U.S. is subsidizing apartheid in Israel. Not the least is her contention that the arrangement for so much of the "subsidies" Israel receives is not of consequence to the United States. American taxpayers are reaping benefits for the money, which is used for purchases here at home. She is "outraged" that the Al-Aqsa Mosque (and I have been there, a number of times) was the scene of Israeli police breaking up the rioters who threw rocks, other projectiles and fireworks down on civilians gathered below on the plaza. Where is her sense of "outrage" at the Hamas-directed rocket attacks on Israeli civilian populations? Does she not consider the millions of dollars and euros given to the Gazans for health improvements and housing but appropriated by Hamas to build terror tunnels an injustice? Lastly, it is well-known that the Israeli Arabs who live in Israel have more political rights and life-improving benefits than their brethren in Gaza and have said many times that they do not want to trade their way of life for another under Hamas or Palestine Liberation Organization rule.
Enough, Ms. Bader: You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but you cannot change the facts.
Ardis Wexler, Edina
• • •
Has anyone else noticed how deftly Benjamin Netanyahu has changed the conversation? Last month, witness testimony began for his corruption trial. Two weeks ago, Israel's president asked Netanyahu's political rival to form a government. Yet everyone is talking about war with Hamas.
It's pointless to try to pin blame in the centuries-old Middle East conflict, but the latest flare-up can be traced to the Israeli government's unnecessarily severe restrictions on Palestinians as they tried to celebrate Ramadan over the past few weeks. Israel's ongoing harsh treatment of a particular class of citizens within its own borders is the reason that many are beginning to regard the system there as apartheid.
As bombs and bodies fall from the disproportionate escalation, Netanyahu has shown that he is willing to expend Jewish as well as Arab lives for his own political survival. He has also proven he will never be a partner in peace.
Netanyahu must go. And U.S. President Joe Biden must end his unconditional support for whatever Israel does.
Jeff Naylor, Minneapolis
• • •
The caption of a video on StarTribune.com says, "An Israeli airstrike destroyed a high-rise building in Gaza City that housed offices of the Associated Press and other media outlets on Saturday, the latest step by the military to silence reporting from the territory amid its battle with the militant group Hamas." This is a prejudicial statement that wrongly judges the motivation of Israel's military actions. The motivation for striking at specific buildings is to stop the ability of Hamas (defined by much of the world as a terrorist organization, not simply "militant") to produce and fire rockets at the civilian population of Israel. Very, very often, Hamas has assets (and hides assets) inside regular office buildings, such as the one mentioned.
Israel is not attempting to silence media voices. Look online and you will see media coverage of what is occurring. Israel is doing all it can to end Hamas' ability to hide and manufacture weapons by which to destroy Israeli civilians (who are their target). Hamas and its ally the Islamic Jihad organization are two groups that are dedicated to murdering Jews around the world (just look at their charter for proof). Horribly, Hamas kills its own people, Gazans, by making them human shields in their political and military operations.