In response to the Feb. 18 editorial ("Save smiling tower") to the city of Freeport — message received loud and clear!
We sincerely thank you for sharing a heartfelt interest in our unique "smiley water tower." Your eloquently written piece was well-received by many. The "world needs more smiles, not fewer" in an increasingly polarized world of "politics and social media," resonated with residents and I-94 travelers far and wide. We have closely read many of the comments on the various message boards about what our piece of Americana brings to everyone who has seen our century-old tower. While there will always be differing opinions about what we should do for the tower, we have listened to, and learned from, other communities that have lost their own water towers as cultural landmarks. In outstate Minnesota, the many churches and water towers that dot the skylines act as the wayside markers for travelers. The time for us to act is now. While we do need to wait for the spring weather to have our updated study completed on the integrity and paint coatings of the structure, we have already put into action the efforts needed to save the tower. Work to secure donations from our local partners has been successful to assist in the preservation effort.
Additional donations are being accepted and are welcomed by all. Thanks to our Freeport Chamber of Commerce, those donations can be mailed to: Freeport Preservation Committee, Attn: Save the Smile, PO Box 162, Freeport, MN 56331. They can also be mailed or delivered to the Freeport State Bank. We have established a GoFundMe page (tinyurl.com/savethesmile) and it is linked to the Freeport Chamber of Commerce's Facebook page. Please "like" the Freeport Chamber's Facebook page for further updates on ways to give at www.facebook.com/freeportmnchamber.
Mayor Mike Eveslage, Freeport, Minn.
SUPER TUESDAY
Why I'm voting for Klobuchar, even though she won't be the nominee
I plan to vote for Sen. Amy Klobuchar on Tuesday, but not because I think she is the likely presidential nominee. Let me explain: At this admittedly early stage, it appears that Sen. Bernie Sanders will reach a plurality, but probably not a majority of Democratic Party delegates. That means a brokered convention, with likely two candidates splitting the ticket. Here are possibilities among the most viable candidates:
1. Joe Biden or Mike Bloomberg with Klobuchar or Pete Buttigieg or Elizabeth Warren, or any other such combination. I think all these scenarios fail if Sanders is the plurality vote-getter. Notwithstanding that after a first vote failing to find a majority presidential candidate, delegates are free to cast votes as they wish, there will be great pressure to put Sanders on the ballot, if only because his followers might not even bother to vote if he is not, which would turn into a likely President Donald Trump win.
2. Biden with Sanders or Sanders with Biden. Swap in Bloomberg for Biden if you want. Still not a viable scenario. None would want to be vice president.
3. Sanders with Warren. Our two most liberal candidates on the ballot? Not going to happen, and would be a rout for Trump.
4. Sanders with Buttigieg. An interesting thought, but I think most people who are worried about Sanders's age and health would have trouble with a vice president with such little experience.