Public money's political power

July 16, 2010 at 9:59PM

A happy Tom Horner personally served notice Friday that his Independence Party campaign for governor had crossed an important threshhold. It had collected more than the 700 $50 contributions required to qualify for a public campaign subsidy later this year, with three days to spare before the deadline. If he wins the IP primary, his campaign stands to receive an estimated $241,500 in time for the general election, according to the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board.

A quick Google search unearthed an explanation for Horner's excitement. An analysis of Gov. Jesse Ventura's 1998 victory by state Senate counsel Peter Wattson, dating from 1999, is entitled "How Minnesota's campaign finance law helped elect a third-party governor." It relates how Ventura's ability to borrow money against that year's expected $310,000 public subsidy for gubernatorial candidates made it possible for him to air TV ads and do a credibility-building campaign tour just before the election. Lacking those things, most analysts believe that Ventura would not have been the winner of that year's three-way race.

Horner -- who isn't known to look good in a feather boa -- isn't modeling his campaign after Ventura's. But 12 years and the rise of the Internet don't appear to have changed one aspect of Minnesota gubernatorial campaigns: A candidate must advertise on television to be taken seriously.

about the writer

about the writer

Lori Sturdevant

Columnist

Lori Sturdevant is a retired Star Tribune editorial writer and columnist. She was a journalist at the Star Tribune for 43 years and an Editorial Board member for 26 years. She is also the author or editor of 13 books about notable Minnesotans. 

See Moreicon

More from Opinion

See More
card image
Richard Tsong-Taatarii/The Minnesota Star Tribune

Calls for de-escalation and toning down the rhetoric in recent days is exactly what was needed, even if it might have felt like capitulation.

card image
card image