Thirty-one years ago, hordes of media and onlookers camped out near St. Mary's Hospital in London, waiting for the arrival of the newest royal heir.
Since the birth of that heir, now-expectant father Prince William, medical science has mapped the human genome, cloned a sheep and created a vaccine to protect against chickenpox.
But when it comes to medicine's skill at predicting the arrival of the royal baby — reportedly due Saturday for Prince William's wife, Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge — not much has actually changed.
"If you're taking an office pool and trying to pick a day, we are as bad at that now as we were 30 years ago," said Hyagriv Simhan, chief of maternal fetal medicine and vice chair of obstetrics at Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
And even though doctors have made advances toward accurately predicting due dates, they still can't explain what makes one baby stay snugly in the womb while others bust out ahead of schedule.
"Should I be able to answer that question, I would receive the next Nobel Prize in medicine," said Eugene Scioscia, vice chair of obstetrics and gynecology for the West Penn Allegheny Health System in Pennsylvania. "It's been studied ad nauseam, and we don't know."
Pregnancy is still dated, as it has been for decades if not centuries, primarily by the date of the mother's last menstrual period, Scioscia said.
The biggest change in the field has been ultrasound technology, which was just getting started in pregnancy use in the early 1980s.