Armed with a pretty good understanding of the stock market, Alan Wenker spent an entire decade engaged in stop-and-start efforts to find a better plan for himself and his colleagues at Feed Products North, a small company in Maplewood that sells minerals to animal feed mills.
Yes, you read that right. Ten years. It should not take that long, and the marketplace for retirement plans for smaller employers has improved a bit since Wenker set out on his quest.
Still, anyone at a smaller company who would like to cut costs in half while also offering improved investment choices, as he did, would be wise to consider the hurdles Wenker had to clear.
So why are all the details so important? Most people starting their careers now will spend 45 years trying to save enough so they can stop working someday. But if the investment costs and fees inside your 401(k) or similar fund average, say, 1 percent of your assets each year instead of 0.25 percent, the difference can cost more than $100,000 by retirement.
And that's just the fees side. Most actively managed mutual funds, which try to pick investments that will do better than an index of similar securities, often don't outperform that index over long periods of time. Even so, many employers don't provide a full menu of index funds inside their retirement plans.
Wenker, now 47, was only beginning to understand all this in 2000 when he went to work for Feed Products North as the company's controller. His new company had no plan in 2000, so he decided to start one. And he took the path of least resistance, signing up for the 401(k) plan that his company's payroll processor offered. When Feed Products North switched providers a couple of years later, Wenker moved the plan as well.
All along, however, his opinions about investing were evolving. He'd read Andrew Tobias's book "The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need" and became a fan of the National Public Radio show now called "Marketplace Money."
Oops: High costs and no index funds