WASHINGTON – The FBI counterterrorism division's identification of a movement it calls "black identity extremists" is the latest addition to the list of protesters and dissidents the agency puts under the "domestic terrorism" umbrella.
But many national security experts say the designation doesn't describe a movement at all, let alone a terrorism threat. It's simply a label that allows the FBI to conduct additional surveillance on "basically anyone who's black and politically active," said Michael German, who left the FBI in 2004 and did undercover domestic terrorism work.
Critics are concerned that increasingly, it appears to be minorities and environmentalists who are being targeted.
While the practice of labeling certain protest groups as domestic terrorists is not unique to President Donald Trump's administration, Hina Shamsi, national security project director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said there's concern that "abusive and unjustified investigations" by the FBI are rising.
"We are worried that protesters are increasingly being labeled as terrorism threats," Shamsi said.
It's difficult to know for sure whether the Trump administration engages in the practice more often, however, because the FBI and other law enforcement entities rarely make that information available to the public. But critical rhetoric by the Justice Department and the White House also tends to inform FBI decisions, German said, and empowers those seeking to target those groups.
The problem, Shamsi said, is partly in the overly broad definition of domestic terrorism in the Patriot Act as a violation of U.S. or state criminal laws that is "dangerous to human life" and appears to be intended to "influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion."
Eighty-four members of Congress cited that intention to intimidate or coerce in a letter to the Justice Department this past week that asked whether the department had labeled Dakota Access pipeline protesters domestic terrorists. Calls and e-mails to multiple members of Congress who signed the letter were not returned.