The most important election for governor in decades is less than two months away. It comes at a time of rapid economic, demographic and social change in Minnesota. A wrong move now in state policy could erode the prosperity that several generations sacrificed to achieve.
It's too soon for us to recommend one candidate for governor. Campaigns matter, and we want this one to play out well into October before we make our endorsement.
But after watching a full month of general-election campaigning, we're issuing a challenge to moderate Minnesota voters seeking a break from polarization. A genuine three-way race is on. Independence Party candidate Tom Horner ranks as a serious contender, and he deserves full consideration by Minnesotans who in more ordinary times might not look at a third-party candidate. That's especially true of those who value a more centrist, pragmatic approach to governing than has so far been offered up by the GOP and DFL candidates.
This isn't a typical year in Minnesota politics. And it isn't typical of this newspaper to put an editorial on the Opinion Exchange section cover. But extraordinary times warrant a break with usual patterns.
Two developments since the Aug. 10 primary have earned Horner consideration alongside DFLer Mark Dayton and Republican Tom Emmer, despite the comparatively small size of his party.
The first is Horner's release of a well-crafted, credible answer to the giant question urgently confronting the next governor: How will you balance the state budget?
A deficit projected at $5.8 billion, or 15 percent of the cost of current state commitments in 2012-13, demands a swift gubernatorial response next year.
Among the three candidates, Horner's budget plan is the most detailed and sensible to date. It relies on new revenues (from both income and sales taxes) and spending restraint to close the gap. It also outlines reform measures on both the tax and spending sides of the ledger that would mitigate the negative impact of higher taxes on the economy, and of reduced spending on the reach and quality of government services.