According to new stats on smoking, more Minnesota teens have decided they don't want to stand outside when it's 20 below sucking on highly taxed twitch-sticks. Smoking rates are down, and that's good. This figure from the study, however, sounded curious:
"The declines occurred even though the tobacco industry now spends about $228 million a year on marketing in Minnesota, up from about $170 million eight years ago."
Never mind the "even though" -- if marketing was just programming for robots, everybody would have joined the Army and Denny Hecker would be diving in money, Scrooge McDuck style. Here's the real question:
How are they managing to spend a quarter of a billion dollars a year marketing in this state? Billboards have been banned for 10 years. They couldn't put up a billboard if it said "Smoke Spud -- they're chock-full of toasted cadmium, make your DNA unravel, and each one has more tar than MnDOT'S annual road repair budget, but only a small percentage of the opposite sex will be appalled by your aroma!"
Even then the billboard would have a Surgeon General's Warning -- which, at this stage in the game, should just say AS IF YOU DON'T KNOW or perhaps OH, GO COUGH UP A LUNG. YOU HAVE A SPARE. NO, SERIOUSLY: QUIT.
Smoking has been stigmatized to the point where it's an immoral act -- stand in line at the convenience store, and half the people who ask for smokes have the furtive shame of someone asking for a magazine with trussed-up nurses on the cover.
The anti-smoking advocates, however, aren't content with the progress made thus far. Movies, they note, glamorize smokers, and this leads gullible teens down the ash-strewn path to perdition.
Well, movies used to make smoking attractive. Look at any movies from the '40s -- most of them should have Phillip Morris listed in the credits as a co-star. Everyone smoked. Rin Tin Tin smoked. You expect to see Shirley Temple doing a tap dance with a Chesterfield dangling from her lips.