Editor's note: This article has multiple authors. They are listed below.
Minneapolis, the "City of Lakes," has a dirty little secret. In a state with one of the highest drowning rates for children of color in the nation, the city has no public, community-accessible indoor pools offering year-round swimming instruction. Unfortunately, in Minneapolis, the opportunities to learn to swim — and to reap the many health benefits that can come with swimming regularly — are too often reserved for those with means.
On April 1, six of the nine members of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board voted to move forward with restoring and expanding a Park Board-owned pool in the Phillips Community Center. With the opening of the Phillips Aquatics Center, close to public transportation, these commissioners made a huge contribution to the equity picture in Minneapolis.
The best part of all this is that 57 percent of the capital required for the project has already been raised by outside sources, and the money continues to come in.
Additionally, outside revenue sources covering the bulk of core operating expenses have been identified and have committed to providing funding for the first five years of operation, with no indication that these commitments could not continue beyond that time period. Finally, a detailed business plan was developed showing how, with enough lanes, the pool could be used to generate revenue to help offset the cost of operation, while always providing access to the citizens of Minneapolis 16 hours per day.
Given that all of this was organized by unpaid volunteers, the members of the Park Board felt comfortable that its professional staff, working in conjunction with these volunteers, could make the project a success.
It was disturbing, however, to read the Star Tribune's article about this decision (first published online and then in print on April 4, under the headline "Parks to spend big on pool for south Mpls."). Here are a few of the items of concern:
• The board did not choose the most expensive option. The most expensive option was an eight-lane competition pool, with a four-lane teaching pool and expanded community resources. The cost for this option had been estimated by the Park Board at up to $7.9 million. What the commissioners chose is a never-before-proposed midrange compromise at a cost of $5.42 million.