I see that my Matt Hasselbeck idea went over like a 12th man in the huddle, but we march on regardless (P.S. The idea was to acquire TWO quarterbacks, one from the first round to be great long-term and one from the veteran scrap pile to at least be competitive and keep us all awake through a portion of 2011. Matt could be heading for that pile since his contract is up this year. Of course, I suppose I could have suggested that Tom Brady be cloned, fall from the sky and land on a purple pillow on the stoop outside Winter Park) ...
Ah, that feels better.
FIRST DOWN:
In a perfect world, the owners and the players would have common sense. They'd believe all of their hollow quotes about how important the fans are to them. They'd put down the hatchet that's about to lop off the head of the goose that lays the $9 billion eggs.
However, we all know we're heading toward a lockout. The two sides won't get together by March 3, which means the collective bargaining agreement will expire. Asked on a conference call yesterday if he felt a lockout was "inevitable," NFL Players' Association committee member Scott Fujita, a Browns linebacker, said, "It certainly looks that way to me."
Few fans will care about a lockout on March 4. That will be about the time y'all are filling out your MARCH MADNESS! brackets. (Is it really "MADNESS" when Duke, North Carolina or Kansas always seem to win anyway?)
Anyhoo, true football fans -- true Vikings fans in particular -- DO NOT want their teams' shutting down offseason activities in March.
Take the Vikings, for instance. They're by far the least stable team in their division. The other teams -- Green Bay, Chicago and Detroit -- are solid in the front office, have strong general managers and their coaching staffs are set. They also are set for the long term at quarterback.