Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
In a leather box on a top shelf of my closet are a handful of the things most precious to me. There are a few gifts from mentors, a college award, a tie clip that my grandfather wore, some family artifacts and a letter from former President Jimmy Carter. The letter is precious because Carter changed me for the better.
In 2008, I was a moderately successful law professor at Baylor Law School. I had gone to teach there in 2000 after five years as a federal prosecutor in Detroit. I wrote academic articles, taught a variety of classes and received tenure after six years. I enjoyed my students and colleagues, and had made many friends in Waco. It was a satisfying and comfortable job.
Carter shook that up.
Over his century of work he had a lot of plans, and one of them was to bring Black and white Baptists together after a division of over a century. Together with one my former colleagues at Baylor, Bill Underwood, Carter organized an event at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta to unveil a “New Baptist Covenant” that would bridge that historic gap. Speakers in the enormous main hall included Carter himself, former President Bill Clinton, the Rev. William Shaw, Marian Wright Edelman, John Grisham and similar figures from across the racial divide. It was a striking event, full of hope for a new era — the kind of hope that Carter engendered several times in his remarkable career as a public servant and citizen.
My parents, who had long admired Carter, drove down from Detroit and a large contingent traveled in from Baylor, which is a Baptist university. There was some genuine and understandable wariness on the part of the Black Baptists about the gathering, rooted in centuries of racism and harm. But still, they came, and for a few days at least Carter’s hopes were realized.
While the former presidents and other luminaries spoke in the grand main hall, I was speaking, too — in a windowless basement room with rows of folding chairs. My topic was one that I knew well. For years I had been studying the 100-to-1 ratio between crack and powder cocaine used in federal statutes and sentencing guidelines, which directed the same prison sentence for trafficking 500 grams of powder cocaine or 5 grams of crack. The ratio produced shocking racial disparities, something I had seen firsthand as a prosecutor in Detroit. I had written a series of academic articles about the harm done by the crack-powder ratio and set out that critique at a number of law conferences. I knew my material.