Not that you need to give a hoot, but this column first reaches the StarTribune newsroom editors by email via the Internet.
After that, the editors move the words all around so the big fish I always catch seem smaller. That's a joke, just wanted to make sure you were paying attention.
Email has been a wonderful invention -- thanks, Al Gore--- for submitting hunting and fishing yarns from anywhere in the world. No muss, no fuss, no typewriters or copy paper, no dictation over the phone to some newsroom intern who couldn't spell walleye or Winnibigoshish.
But I digress.
Since the advent of email, readers of this column have become more vocal and that's a good thing. Usually. Except for a few jerks, most senders of emails have something interesting to say or a point of view different from mine that deserves to travel the Internet ... even if it's ridiculous.
Sometimes emails arrive from old acquaintances who, frankly, have been forgotten for whatever reason.
The other day, for example, an email arrived from John L. Clay, a former resident of Duluth, who moved to Montana decades ago. He got right to the point, remembering a column I wrote about a trout fishing foray with him, mind you, 38 years ago.
"I think I became a member of the old farts club when I started telling the truth about the size of my fish," he wrote. "Obviously you have not reached that plateau yet as you referred to that Brook Trout I caught as being only 8 inches. Then proceeded to reduce its size to 6 inches. It was 14 inches or was it 18?"