Re-examining deer densities around Minnesota

  • Article by: DOUG SMITH , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 26, 2014 - 12:30 AM

DNR seeks input from hunters, farmers and others on population levels of the state's whitetails.


Reaching consensus on deer populations is next to impossible, but the DNR initiated a three-year process last week to solicit advice and feedback as it re-examines deer density goals it set in 2005-2007.

Photo: David Joles •,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

– How many deer should roam Minnesota?

A three-year process that began quietly last week at the Lake City High School auditorium ultimately will determine whether deer populations around the state are increased, decreased or left the same.

The results will affect the state’s 500,000 whitetail hunters — as well as motorists who dodge deer, farmers who sometimes curse them and wildlife watchers who often cherish them.

And in the end, one thing is almost certain: “Not everyone will be satisfied with the outcome,” said Leslie McInenly, Department of Natural Resources big game program leader charged with the goal-setting process. But hopefully most people will generally be in agreement that it’s a decent outcome.”

The DNR is re-examining statewide deer density goals it set in 2005-2007, when whitetail populations were intentionally reduced in many areas. For hunters, those goals are important because they are used to help set hunting regulations. For example, in areas where deer densities exceed goals, more antlerless hunting permits might be made available. And if densities are low, chances of bagging a whitetail diminish.

The existing density goals, set after a public input process similar to the one that began last Wednesday night in Lake City, have been questioned by some hunters, especially after a 2013 hunting season that produced the lowest whitetail harvest in 15 years.

Some say deer populations were lowered too much. Hunters who spoke at the Lake City meeting — the beginning a re-examination of southeast deer density goals — echoed those sentiments.

“We’re seeing way less deer,” said David Noll of Lake City. “For the last four or five years, the farmers and hunters in the area where I hunt all say the same thing: They’re seeing less deer.”

Said another hunter: “People didn’t see a lot of deer and weren’t happy. I’d like to see the herd increased.”

McInenly told the group that, while hunting is important and has a $725 million economic impact in the state, several other issues must also be considered when determining deer densities.

“There were an estimated 41,000 deer-vehicle collisions in 2012,” she said, citing insurance industry reports, including 342 injuries and five fatalities.

Deer also eat crops, and a survey of 2,000 southeast landowners in 2011 estimated deer caused them $3 million in damage.

High deer densities also can change forest habitat. And disease is a concern. McInenly said the DNR has spent $10 million over the past 12 years on chronic wasting disease surveillance and eradicating bovine tuberculosis from wild deer in the northwest.

Is the process fair?

Brooks Johnson of Monticello, president of Minnesota Bowhunters Inc., has been a vocal critic of the 2005-2007 goal-setting process, and the resulting lowering of deer densities. He has launched the Minnesota Deer Density Initiative to push the DNR to immediately boost the deer population.

Johnson says few hunters knew about the process and its importance. He questions whether they were fairly represented on citizen advisory panels that helped the DNR formulate the goals.

DNR officials counter that the process, like the current one, was transparent and the advisory groups included citizens with varied interests, dominated by hunters.

McInenly, meanwhile, said the DNR will re-examine deer density goals by region over the next three years. Besides the southeast this year, the agency will look at five regions next year and six in 2016. (The DNR set new goals in the southwest and two areas in the northeast in 2012.)

  • related content

  • The southeast citizen advisory team: Who they are

    Tuesday February 25, 2014

    Here are short biographies of the 21 members of the southeast citizen advisory team, provided by the DNR. The team...

  • Emergency deer feeding probably ready to begin next week

    Wednesday February 26, 2014

    The first state-financed emergency deer feeding program in 17 years should begin by next week in parts of northern Minnesota.“We...

  • The DNR's Leslie McInenly explained deer population goal setting procedures to about 100 whitetail hunters on Wednesday night at Lake City.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.


Team Irvin 7:15 PM
Team Carter
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 96 4th Qtr 1:14
Cleveland 105
Dallas 5:00 PM
New Orleans
Indiana 5:00 PM
LA Clippers 5:00 PM
Minnesota 5:00 PM
Detroit 6:00 PM
Milwaukee 6:00 PM
San Antonio
Boston 7:00 PM
Golden State
Washington 7:00 PM
Houston 8:30 PM
LA Lakers
Team Toews 3 1st Prd 3:36
Team Foligno 4
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 51 2nd Half 0:43
Illinois State 51
Louisville 66 2nd Half 3:45
Pittsburgh 58
UMBC 28 2nd Half 15:54
Albany 39
Niagara 30 2nd Half
Iona 45
Notre Dame 5:30 PM
NC State
Belmont 5:30 PM
Tennessee St
Creighton 6:00 PM
Northwestern 6:30 PM
Washington 7:30 PM
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
Colorado 65 2nd Half 4:56
Washington St 57
(14) Kentucky 73 2nd Half 5:06
Missouri 63
(9) Oregon State 67 2nd Half 1:00
(13) Arizona State 51
Vermont 42 2nd Half 13:26
UMass Lowell 53
Iowa State 34 2nd Half
(8) Texas 40
Southern Ill 29 2nd Half
Wichita State 43
(15) Duke 23 1st Half 3:50
(12) North Carolina 32
Miami-Florida 29 1st Half 2:51
(4) Louisville 25
(21) Minnesota 9 1st Half 7:59
(25) Rutgers 25
California 6:00 PM
(11) Stanford 7:00 PM
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question