Souhan: Can Wild ride recent success to playoffs?

  • Article by: JIM SOUHAN , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 9, 2014 - 12:49 AM

Mike Yeo has struggled with prosperity previously.

hide

Wild head coach Mike Yeo and his players looked for answers against the Blues, an eventual 2-1 loss, earlier this season.

Photo: Richard Tsong-Taatarii, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

It’s easy to be dissatisfied with the Wild. The Generic Varmints haven’t won a playoff series since 2003. They haven’t drafted and developed a star or pure scorer other than Marian Gaborik.

Their style of play, like that of many NHL teams, can be stultifying. They never seem to play their best when they are healthy, and they are rarely healthy. Their best young players are unreliable, and they are relying on goaltenders who are ill, old or inexperienced.

Given their flaws and challenges, it’s instructive to look at the progress they’ve made over their past three seasons.

In 2011-12, Mike Yeo, in his first year as coach, buggy-whipped a mediocre roster to 81 points. This achievement was not appreciated because the team lapsed in the second half and failed to make the playoffs. Given that team’s talent level, 81 points, or .99 points per game, was a more-than-reasonable return.

In 2012-13, the Wild signed Zach Parise and Ryan Suter, then earned 55 points in a shortened season, averaging 1.15 points per game. The team earned a playoff spot and offered occasional resistance to the Chicago Blackhawks, the eventual Stanley Cup winner.

In 2013-2014, the Wild has often disappointed for stretches, and has often been at its worst when healthiest. In total, though, the Wild is on pace for 96 points, which would mean earning 1.17 points per game. Barring a collapse, the Wild would make the playoffs for a second consecutive season.

For those who dreamed that Parise and Suter would turn the Wild into contenders for home ice in the first round of the playoffs and contenders for a Cup, the past two seasons have been disappointing. Given the broader view of how poor the Wild’s roster was before they arrived, and how reliant the current roster is on youngsters and unreliable goaltenders, this can be said:

Parise and Suter have done their jobs well. They have made the Wild relevant again.

Yeo, too, has done his job well over the past month. With Mikko Koivu and sometimes Parise hurt, and often without his top two goaltenders, Yeo has helped the Wild go 11-4-2 over its past 17 games before the Olympic break.

Yeo often has dragged impressive performances out of minor league call-ups and role players.

For the Wild to improve from relevant to dangerous, Yeo will have to prove he can coach just as well when managing a full, not-untalented roster.

Yeo earned the Wild job by succeeding in the minor leagues. He has a natural affinity for unheralded grinders and talented youngsters.

Barring an injury during Olympic play, Yeo should have a full complement of talented skaters when the NHL season resumes. Parise has played brilliantly since returning from his foot injury. Suter remains a tireless and savvy defender. Koivu should return at full strength after the Olympics.

Despite his agreeable personality, Yeo has proved to be something of a contrarian coach. He tends to overachieve when given a mediocre roster, and flail when given healthy, high-end talent. He thrives when rumors of his imminent dismissal surface.

“I guess one thing we do is we try to present the challenge that is out there,’’ Yeo said. “Knowing that competitors, they love a challenge. I think we all do. When there’s a challenge in front of us, it’s fun to go out there and conquer it.’’

Yeo has survived the goalie shuffle. He has survived injuries to Parise, Koivu and Harding, three of the team’s five most important players. He has survived informed speculation about his impending firing when the team slumped.

“Piece of cake,’’ he joked. “Slept like a baby.’’

After the Olympics, the Wild will face its toughest stretch of schedule, and Yeo will face the defining challenge of his head coaching tenure.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 32 FINAL
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 99 FINAL
LA Lakers 87
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: How optimistic are you about the 2015 Twins?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close