What's the right distance for girls' cross-country?

  • Article by: DAVID LA VAQUE , Star Tribune
  • Updated: September 23, 2013 - 11:50 PM

Many girls’ cross-country coaches favor increasing the race distance; others fear a participation dropoff.

hide

Edina junior Shannon Spalding, center, broke the school’s 5K record last year at the Roy Griak Inviational, the only meet that didn’t run the usual 4K distance. “Some girls were more nervous and afraid of running the extra 1K,” Spalding said. “That’s sad because this is what we should be running, and we were afraid to run it.”

Photo: ELIZABETH FLORES • eflores@startribune.com,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Nearly 1,000 girls’ cross-country runners from high schools around Minnesota are bracing for their lone 5,000-meter race of the fall, Saturday’s Roy Griak Invitational.

Meets such as the Griak would be the rule rather than the exception if some of those runners and their coaches have a choice. Girls have run 4,000-meter varsity meets since 1994.

Last fall the state cross-country coaches association surveyed its members and found 61 percent in favor of moving up to the 5K distance for girls.

Minnesota is one of only 10 states in which girls compete in shorter races than boys during the regular season. A 4K is 2½ miles. Boys’ races are the standard 5K (3.1 miles).

Proponents of a longer race for girls believe Minnesota should be in step with the majority of the country and that top-end runners would be better prepared for national and collegiate success.

Those against an increase fear a change that might reduce participation numbers, especially among smaller Class 1A schools.

Slightly more than half of Class 1A coaches support lengthening the race for girls running varsity and junior varsity. Support was stronger — approaching 70 percent — among Class 2A coaches, according to responses from the survey that was given to 85 coaches.

Edina junior Shannon Spalding, in her second year of cross-country and the Hornets’ top runner, competed in the Griak meet last year and broke the school’s 5K record. She plans to run again with her teammates Saturday.

“Last year everyone was excited. Nobody was complaining but some girls were more nervous and afraid of running the extra 1K,” Spalding said. “That’s sad because this is what we should be running, and we were afraid to run it.”

4K support, burnout fears

About 80 percent of coaches in both classes said in the survey that they believed girls are physically able to race 5,000 meters. They also generally agreed, by a 3-1 margin, that race distance is not an issue of gender equity.

“We’re not letting the topic go away but we’re not rushing into it,” said Tom Sharp, Eastview boys’ cross-country coach and president of the cross-country coaches association.

Both Jane Reimer Morgan of Minnetonka and Rey Zimney of Pierz were coaching in 1994 when the distance last increased, from 3,200 meters to 4,000. Neither could recall a decline in participation numbers that some coaches feared. However, they are staunch supporters of keeping the 4K distance.

Zimney said he doesn’t understand “why the whole state should have to change for a very few number of runners” who go on to compete at national meets or in college. Zimney said he can “count on one hand” the number of girls he coached in the past 40 years who competed in college.

“I have no problem with 2A schools making the change but leave 1A out of it,” he said.

Reimer Morgan, a 37-year coaching veteran, is concerned with burning out young runners. About 340 Minnesota schools have girls’ cross-country teams, which count more than 5,000 participants, according to the Minnesota State High School League.

Many school districts allow seventh- and eighth-graders to compete on junior varsity and varsity teams. Reimer Morgan said she would miss the number of e-mails she receives from former runners who were average high school performers but made running part of their adult lifestyle.

“The top of the line runners would be fine,” Reimer Morgan said. “I’m worried about turning off kids who don’t know yet they might be a good runner. Let them grow into it. Maybe the rest of the nation isn’t so smart.”

  • related content

  • Monday's prep results

    Tuesday September 24, 2013

    MONDAYsoccer • boysSt. paul city• Como Park 2, Washington 1, OTSOCCER • girlsMETROPOLITAN AREA• Benilde-St. Margaret’s 10, Holy Family 1•...

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 25 4th Qtr 3:38
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 67 3rd Qtr 4:33
LA Lakers 51
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: How optimistic are you about the 2015 Twins?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close