'A crisis is a terrible thing to waste." That was the mantra in government for the last several years of budget crisis in Minnesota. The result, however, was short-term decisionmaking focused primarily on making the books appear to add up.
The new year ahead offers bigger opportunities.
In 2013, despite the fact that we started the year with another $600-million-plus budget deficit, the Legislature and Gov. Mark Dayton started to shift focus to the intermediate and long-term. The investment the Legislature made last spring in early childhood, all-day kindergarten and college-tuition freezes for middle-class families started us down that path. Nonetheless, too much time and attention was necessarily spent cleaning up old messes.
That's why the news was so welcome earlier this month that Minnesota's economic growth continues to outpace the nation's, that our state's books are honestly and structurally balanced (with some cushion), and that budgetary sleights of hand like the school shift are fully paid off. It gives Minnesota policymakers some breathing room to imagine what we want our state to become.
Our budget stability also offers legislators a chance to step away from zero-sum partisan fights that have not served Minnesota well. The truth is that Minnesotans generally agree on a common agenda, the heart of which is a strong economy generating sustainable and broadly shared prosperity and a growing middle class. As I see it, that means taking on the dual challenges of achieving global economic leadership and closing a devastating income and opportunity gap. I am confident that is an agenda legislators of all parties can rally around.
We cannot achieve prosperity unless we continue to be a state where solid, innovative businesses can grow. Democrats need to listen more attentively to small businesses and their legitimate concerns about red tape. We cannot forget that small-business owners are critical members of the middle class.
But it's also time for policymakers to reject the mind-set that cutting taxes is beginning and end of the discussion when it comes to the economy. Most businesspeople I talk to don't agree. Indeed, that tax obsession has stifled meaningful discussion about the long-term sustainability of Minnesota's economy. The conversation should not be about whether we are a high- or low-tax state. It should be about whether we are a high-value state.
As groups like Greater MSP have pointed out, Minnesota can settle for nothing less than global leadership in areas from health care to food processing to advanced manufacturing and technology where we have a competitive edge. Our global competitors understand that government is an essential partner in providing strategic investments in education, infrastructure, transportation and basic research. We can find common ground about what it will take for Minnesota businesses to compete and win against the best in the world.