The Star Tribune appears to have forgotten to print the final paragraph of its Sept. 18 editorial, in which it challenges the proposed undergraduate tuition freeze at both the University of Minnesota and the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system. As observed at the end of the editorial, "postsecondary education [is] now as critical to adult self-sufficiency as a high school diploma was 50 years ago." But, as the old saying goes, "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." So the logic of the editorial continues, necessarily, to the conclusion of calling for the imposition of tuition payments by the parents of Minnesota's high school students. After all, the Editorial Board has placed the two stages of education on a par. And if it is not calling for tuition for high school, then its reluctance to place the burden on students and their families should also guide its thinking about public higher education.
As higher education becomes essential to most jobs and careers, the state really should fund it as it funds K-12 education. Minnesota owes it to its citizens to reduce the burden of tuition at the U and MnSCU. The state's economic health depends on an educated population, and another round of tuition increases is another reduction of access to adult self-sufficiency for Minnesota's young adults.
Theodore Gracyk, Moorhead, Minn.
The writer is a college professor.
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS
Yes, back instructors and good students
Thanks to Peter Bell for a succinct analysis and suggested remedy to the problem of dysfunctional classroom environment in public schools ("Reduced suspension will mean reduced enrollment," Sept. 18). City leaders dance around the elephant in the room, accusing overwhelmed teachers of racism and insensitivity, while forcing them to accept dysfunctional behavior as a cultural norm. But who is advocating for the well-behaved learners, and for the dedicated instructors who are attempting to provide a learning environment while contending with distraction and disruption by misbehaving children and irresponsible parents?
Bell's common-sense solution of parents admonishing their children — "If you get in trouble in school, I'm going to be on your teacher's side" — would go a long way toward eliminating the need for many of the workshops, policy changes and politically correct nonsense espoused by leaders. It might also provide incentive for good instructors, frustrated by prevailing classroom conditions, not to leave their teaching careers out of exasperation with a broken educational system.
Alta Hanson, Sauk Centre, Minn.
• • •
The warning given by Bell is worth close attention from those who are concerned about the success of all children in learning. Most teachers wish for more expert help from parents, principals, social workers and counselors to help end suspensions. Smaller class sizes would also allow teachers more time and energy to unravel this spiral of dysfunction.
Jayne Early, St. Paul
• • •