Page 2 of 2 Previous

Continued: Background checks at center of legislative gun debate

  • Article by: JIM RAGSDALE , Star Tribune
  • Last update: March 13, 2013 - 12:14 AM

He described the case of an applicant who had attempted suicide three months earlier and had told a friend if she had a gun she would take her own life. Now she wanted to buy a gun, and because she had not been judicially committed as mentally ill, she may have met the technicalities of the law. He denied the permit.

“I can’t in good faith give that person a permit,” he said.

The current checks apply when licensed dealers are making sales, whether in their shops or at gun shows. They do not apply to person-to-person transactions, whether at gun shows, over the Internet or across the backyard fence. The proposed bills would close this loophole.

“We would submit that it’s not really a loophole, but a huge gaping hole that allows as many as 40 percent of the gun transactions in our state to take place through private sales,” said Flaherty, the police association’s leader. “It is the route that people who know that they are ineligible to pass a background check will travel.”

The 40 percent figure has come under attack. Vick and the NRA say that is an old estimate, produced before federal background checks began. Two professors who produced the estimate, Philip Cook of Duke University and Jens Ludwig of the University of Chicago, say it was based on gun surveys that no longer exist, and they do not know the current number.

Vick estimated that “98 percent” of guns sold at gun shows go through dealers with federal background checks, as do interstate gun sales arranged over websites. He said a universal background check law is aimed at the wrong people, imposing a new burden on “10 percent of law-abiding citizens.”

The chances for universal background checks remain iffy. A competing bill supported by the NRA, which focuses on improving background-check information and cracking down on “straw purchases” of guns by intermediaries, appears to have more support.

Supporters remain convinced that this is a vital step. “We’re not talking about banning any guns,” said David Chipman, a former firearms agent who has lobbied the Legislature on behalf of a national group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns. “We’re going to say, at worst, you’re going to be mildly inconvenienced for the sake of public safety.”

Jim Ragsdale • 651-925-5042


  • related content

  • Inselman

  • dueling positions: Brooklyn Center Police Chief Kevin Benner, left, wants to see background checks extended to private sales. Kevin Vick, an NRA supporter and licensed gun dealer, is opposed.

  • Legislature debates gun background checks


    Federal: All gun purchases from federally licensed dealers subject to federal background checks.

    State: Minnesota purchasers of handguns and semi-automatic, military style assault weapons from licensed dealers need a permit issued by local law enforcement.

    Loophole: Checks do not apply to private purchases; new law aims to close that loophole.

    Police: Worries that up to 40 percent of gun purchases may flow through unchecked transactions into the wrong hands.

    NRA: Says number of unchecked purchases is closer to 10 percent. Believes this change ends traditional neighbor-to-neighbor transactions and could lead to a Big Brother-like system of gun registraion.

    Politics: With solid GOP support and rural DFL support, NRA appears to be outflanking universal background check supporters.

    Next step: Bill expected to come up for vote in Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters