Letter of the Day (Oct. 3): Twins stadium

  • Updated: October 2, 2013 - 6:38 PM

Why aren't the increased revenues finding their way to the payroll?


DAVID BREWSTER • dbrewster@startribune.com Monday 04/12/10 Minneapolis ] Minnesota Twins meet the Boston Red Socks in their season opener at Target Field, the first regular season game in a brand new stadium. ORG XMIT: MIN2012092720524828

Photo: DAVID BREWSTER • Star Tribune,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Regarding Minnesota Twins manager Ron Gardenhire’s contract extension, I don’t share the ire some have shown, because I don’t think he is the problem. When he has had talented players, he has done quite well. Which brings us to the gorilla in the room — the question no reporter dares to ask when interviewing the Pohlads. They told us they couldn’t compete without a new stadium. They said that was the issue. During the first year in the new stadium, the payroll was around $130 million but has been slashed every year. Fans have watched as the team let good player after good player go via trade or free agency (except for one grossly overpaid one who now consumes nearly a third of the payroll).

The public held up its end of the bargain. The team got its new stadium. Now the Pohlads need to step up to the plate. Barring that, they need to explain why they are not spending the increased revenue to improve the team or sell the Twins to someone who will.

JOHN G. MORGAN, Burnsville

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters