Readers Write: (Aug. 19): Driving after drinking, capitalism, ethanol, Southwest LRT, Vikings stadium

  • Updated: August 19, 2013 - 6:53 AM
hide

Photo: ., Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

DRIVING AFTER DRINKING

May my family’s loss be a message to others

I just experienced the loss of my beloved grandson, Jason Johnson, in a tragic car accident. He was 32. I cannot begin to express how devastating this is for our family; it is, literally, the worst time in our life.

Jason made a “decision” to drive home from a bar. The point of this letter is twofold: Had he known the grief this would cause his loved ones, he may have thought twice, because he loved us. He has left behind two little children, who will never truly know their daddy, and if someone — anyone — reading this will think of their family before getting behind the wheel, it would bring me some sense of peace. Think of our family before you turn the key.

BONNIE JOHNSON, Burnsville

* * *

 

CAPITALISM

Military spending hinders benevolence

An Aug. 16 letter stated that capitalism is more benevolent to the poor and disadvantaged than are government programs. It is not capitalism that is the provider of benevolence; capitalism always takes. It is the people who give.

We now find ourselves in a society which is giving less because of choice but also because of hardship. A major source of this hardship is the financial burden placed on citizens by the military-industrial complex and the wars that will inevitably occur. You do not create a military machine like ours and not use it.

Abundant U.S. military spending leaves much less money for benevolent giving by the people. The next time you write out a check to the IRS, think of what good you could really do for others and how much more you could give without a war tax.

BILL HABEDANK, Red Wing, Minn.

* * *

 

ETHANOL

There’s enough corn to go around

According to a recent World Bank study, it’s high oil prices and commodity speculators driving food costs, not the use of corn in ethanol (“Yes — reconsider that ethanol blend rate,” Aug. 16). Some of my fellow farmers in the poultry sector don’t recognize this — and when farmers start fighting with one another, agriculture loses.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close