On Tuesday, Democrats lost big when they ran a candidate but won big when they ran an issue.

In 42 states, about 150 initiatives were on the ballot. The vast majority did not address issues dividing the two parties (e.g., raising the mandatory retirement age for judges, salary increases for state legislators, bond issues supporting a range of projects). But scores of initiatives did involve hot-button issues. And on these, American voters proved astonishingly liberal.

Voters approved every initiative to legalize or significantly reduce the penalties for marijuana possession (Alaska, California, Oregon, Washington, Washington, D.C.). It is true that a Florida measure to legalize medical marijuana lost, but 57 percent voted in favor (60 percent was required.)

Voters approved every initiative to raise the minimum wage (Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska, South Dakota). Voters in San Francisco and Oakland approved initiatives to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2018. The good citizens of Oakland and Massachusetts overwhelmingly approved more generous paid sick leave.

Both Colorado and North Dakota voters rejected measures that would have given the fertilized egg personhood under their criminal codes.

Washington state voters approved background checks for all gun sales and transfers, including private transactions.

By a wide margin, Missourians rejected a constitutional amendment to require teachers to be evaluated based on test results and fired or demoted virtually at will.

By a 59-41 margin, North Dakotans voted to keep their statute outlawing absentee-owned pharmacies despite Wal-Mart outspending independent pharmacist supporters at least 10 to one.

The vote in Colorado offers a good example of the disparity between how Americans vote on candidates and how we vote on issues. A few years ago, the Colorado legislature stripped cities and counties of the right to build their own telecommunications networks, but it allowed them to reclaim that authority if they put it to a vote of their citizens. On Tuesday, eight cities and counties did just that. Residents in every community voted by a very wide margin to permit government-owned networks even while they were voting by an equally wide margin for Republican candidates who vigorously oppose government ownership of anything.

Republicans did gain a number of important victories. Most of these dealt with taxes. For example, Georgia voters by a wide margin supported a constitutional amendment prohibiting the legislature from raising the maximum state income tax rate. Massachusetts voters narrowly voted to overturn a law indexing the state gasoline tax to the consumer price increase.

What did Tuesday tell us? When given the choice between a Republican and a Democratic candidate, the majority of voters chose the Republican. When given a choice between a Republican and a Democratic position on an issue, they chose the Democratic one.

I'll leave it up to others to debate the reasons behind this apparent contradiction. My own opinion is that ballot initiatives more accurately take the ideological pulse of the people because debates over issues must focus on issues, not personality, temperament or looks. Those on both sides of the issue can exaggerate, distort and just plain lie — but they must do so in reference to the question on the ballot.

No ballot initiative ever lost because one of its main backers attended a strip club 16 years earlier.

David Morris is director of the Public Good initiative at the Minneapolis- and Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Local Self-Reliance.