Editorial counterpoint: St. Paul and its partners are working hard to fine-tune the Green Line.
No one has more invested in the success of the Green Line than the city of St. Paul.
We supported small businesses through two years of heavy construction. We reassured residents that their neighborhoods would continue to be wonderful, pedestrian-oriented places to live and that they would be able to get back and forth across University Avenue as they always had. And we invested in new stations, streetlights, trees and other amenities that would strengthen the development potential for the area and boost ridership. Our goal was — and is — to provide high-quality transit and create high-quality places that work for everyone.
We are well on our way. University Avenue has never looked better. More than $4 billion of investment is coming out of the ground. And more than 30,000 passengers a day — even before the University of Minnesota is in session — enjoy safe and comfortable rides to and from their destinations along the line.
Having said all that, we know that high-quality transit means rapid transit — and, on that front, we have some work to do (“Green Line needs more green lights,” editorial, Aug. 21). Like others, I am concerned about the number of times the train is stopped at red lights. That is not how the system was designed to work.
But eight years of design and construction have taught me that the Green Line is not a plug-and-play. Each step has required that a team of engineers from Metro Transit, the city of St. Paul and a host of consultants methodically implement the design, test its impact, adjust the plan and test it again. That is what is happening now, and I am confident that travel times will continue to come down.
My confidence is rooted in four points.
First: From the beginning, the Green Line was designed to interact with the traffic-signal system. Fresh from the opening of their first line, project engineers told me that this line would not pre-empt University Avenue traffic signals in the same way as the Hiawatha Line. The reasons for not designing a full pre-emption system were many. Traffic volumes on the major cross streets in St. Paul were higher than they were along Hiawatha Avenue in Minneapolis. There were many more pedestrians wanting to get back and forth across the street. And, most important, the technology existed to create a system that would give the train the priority it deserved without throwing the entire signal system out of coordination.
Second: The traffic-signal system that was designed for the Green Line is complex and was never expected to work perfectly upon installation. Cities across the country report a considerable period of testing and fine-tuning to coordinate the train with the signal system.
Despite a six-month period designated for testing, Metro Transit, for whatever reason, was not able to begin running the trains on a full schedule until a week before the June 14 opening. While trains were running along the corridor during the spring and operators were being trained, our traffic engineers did not have the opportunity to see how the system operated with trains leaving from both ends of the line every 10 minutes until just days before passengers were on board.
Third: Metro Transit, because of its familiarity with the technology, chose a communication system with traffic signals based on detectors in the tracks that tell the signal that a train is approaching, rather than a GPS-based system that the city engineers recommended — one that is continually communicating with the signal. Detector-based systems work, but they require significantly more adjustments. As we speak, the engineering team is still making those adjustments.
Fourth: Since the middle of July, the project team has been working on employing a “predictive priority” system that will give the train even greater priority as it approaches an intersection. Just a week ago, it implemented those new signal parameters at Victoria, Chatsworth and Grotto as a test of the new design. Next week, the team will assess the impact of that change. Assuming that it worked as was intended — fewer red lights for the train and little if any impact on pedestrian wait times — the city is prepared to install similar parameters at other intersections along the line.
This is how it should be working. This is how it works in cities across the country. Design. Implement. Test. Adjust. Test. Adjust again.
The Green Line is a great addition to our region. Reducing its travel times is a goal we all share. And we are all working to make it happen.
Chris Coleman is mayor of St. Paul.
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.