Chavez succession seems even worse for U.S.

  • Article by: EDITORIAL , Washington Post
  • Updated: March 7, 2013 - 7:22 PM
hide

The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Venezuela's late President Hugo Chavez.

Photo: Ricardo Mazalan, AP

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Anticipating the death of Hugo Chavez, the Obama administration began reaching out months ago to his designated successor, Nicolas Maduro. On Tuesday, that strategy absorbed a body blow: Hours before revealing that Chavez had died of cancer, Maduro tried to blame the United States for his illness, and he expelled two U.S. military attachés on charges of “proposing destabilizing plans” to the armed forces.

So much for the “reset” with Caracas. The ludicrous propaganda launched by Maduro was a sign that Chavez’s successors will be more thuggish and less politically adept than he was — and, if anything, more inclined to scapegoat the United States and Venezuela’s democratic opposition for the horrendous problems the caudillo leaves behind.

Those troubles are staggering, even more so when it is considered that Venezuela, a country of less than 30 million people, collected more than $1 trillion in oil revenue during Chavez’s 14 years of increasingly autocratic rule. Its inflation is among the highest in the world, power outages are routine and consumers are plagued with shortages of basic goods. The murder rate has more than tripled, making Caracas a more dangerous city than Baghdad. Official corruption is rampant, as is drug trafficking.

Perhaps most dangerous of all for the motley crew that inherits this legacy, Venezuelans have been grossly deceived. Chavez assured them he was healthy when he campaigned for re-election last year, even though he surely knew his illness was terminal.

As recently as this month, polls showed that the regime’s propaganda had led a majority of Venezuelans to believe that he would soon resume his duties. The government can no more explain Chavez’s seemingly sudden demise than it can deliver on the extravagant promises he made in his last months, including a mass giveaway of apartments and appliances.

Since his youth, Maduro has been a client of the Castro regime in Cuba, which depends on Venezuela for 60 percent of its energy. The Venezuelan transition has been orchestrated from Havana, where Chavez was secluded from December until two weeks ago; anti-American hysteria is the Castros’ oldest wheeze.

The only mystery here is why the Obama administration is focusing its diplomacy on courting Maduro and his cronies. Venezuela’s constitution says a new presidential election must take place within 30 days, and Maduro will face a challenge from opposition leader Henrique Capriles, who has twice defeated Chavez lieutenants in gubernatorial elections. Nor is it clear that Chavez’s followers will unite behind Cuba’s favorite; the Venezuelan military and politicians close to it are said to be resistant to Havana’s tutelage.

A sensible U.S. policy in these circumstances would start with insistence on a fair vote to determine Chavez’s successor and with the defense of peaceful political actors, such as the Venezuelan students whose protest campground was attacked and burned in the hours after Chavez’s death. Further wooing of Maduro should wait until he demonstrates that he is more than a Castro puppet.

 

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close