Lilydale Regional Park still under study after deadly landslide

  • Article by: CHAO XIONG , Star Tribune
  • Updated: June 4, 2014 - 8:47 PM

A year after two children died, St. Paul is spending more money to study park’s geology.


At Cherokee Park in St. Paul, trails at the Bruce Vento wildlife area and the fossil grounds above Lilydale park remain closed..


CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

In the year since a waterlogged cliff in Lilydale Regional Park collapsed with a group of students on it, killing two and injuring two others, St. Paul has paid a record $1 million settlement to the families involved and spent nearly $200,000 on studies to analyze what happened.

Now as relatives, friends and classmates move past the tragedy’s anniversary, the city is spending another $152,000 to conduct a geological and engineering study of the area where the fourth-graders from Peter Hobart Elementary School in St. Louis Park were killed while looking for fossils.

“We’re trying to be thorough and we’re trying to be expeditious,” said Parks and Recreation Director Mike Hahm. “Both the entire park and the fossil grounds are important natural resources.”

More than a year after Mohamed Fofana and Haysem Sani were killed there on May 22, 2013, the future of the steep Mississippi River bluff area in the 384-acre park — still cordoned off by fencing and concrete barricades — remains unclear.

But city officials said they hope the most recent study, contracted last month with Barr Engineering Co., will guide them in deciding when and how they can reopen the 50-acre fossil grounds for public use.

Results could be available in July and decisions could be made by fall, Hahm said. Possible measures could include signage at the fossil grounds entrance, he said.

“Until we see the outcomes of the engineering reports, it’s premature at this point to speculate on what would be prudent for management of that area,” Hahm said.

Authorities said the students were hiking when a wet hillside of mud, sand and gravel gave way and sent them tumbling about 30 feet into the east clay pit.

Two studies done last year cleared St. Paul of liability but ran over budget, according to city documents. This third study could bring the total cost of reports the city has commissioned in the aftermath of the landslide to about $334,000.

“This was obviously a very tragic accident, and we needed to do a full investigation of what happened,” Hahm said of the studies.

Deciding to reopen

A city contract last July with law firm Nilan Johnson Lewis limited expenses to $85,000, but wound up costing St. Paul $136,494 due to payments to a vendor for e-mail and data retrieval, an invoice said.

The law firm, charged with reviewing the city’s internal processes and communications, concluded that St. Paul officials knew soil erosion was an environmental threat, but could not know it was a risk to visitors.

A contract between the city and Northern Technologies Inc. last June estimated costs and fees at $39,950, but the bill ended up costing $45,845. Northern Technologies, a civil engineering firm that investigated the cause of the collapse, also cleared the city of liability.

Despite the higher than expected costs, City Council Member Dave Thune, whose ward includes the park, defended the expense, saying “I think we’ve obviously learned a great deal about the park. Regardless of what the costs are, we have to maintain a safe city and safe natural grounds. We’re not going to cut corners.”

Jon Kerr, a city resident and park advocate, believes the city could be more transparent.

After the landslide, Hahm said the event was “unprecedented,” adding that city officials weren’t aware of any recent landslides. But, Kerr noted, the city was made aware of a 2011 landslide that was documented by citizens.

“Rather than learn from and positively react from this tragedy, the city has tried to spin and restrict public information,” he said.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters






question of the day

Poll: Grade the Vikings draft selections

Weekly Question