Have you heard that Uber and Lyft are helping alleviate traffic congestion by getting us to give up our personal cars?
That reassuring notion, nurtured by the ride-hailing services, gets repeated often. I've heard various forms of the bromide three times this summer.
The reality: They haven't relieved congestion and probably won't, at least not anytime soon, according to transit consultant Bruce Schaller's provocative report released last month.
Despite the popular narrative, Uber, Lyft and their smaller competitors haven't prompted many people to give up their vehicles, Schaller found. And they've actually made congestion worse by driving billions of additional miles on the nation's roads each year.
The explanation starts with the logistics of modern ride hailing. A trip in a personal vehicle requires driving to the destination. In contrast, ride-hailing services first have to drive to passengers' location before taking them to where they want to go. Those "empty" miles add up.
Another factor: The ride-hailing companies appear to be drawing passengers away from transit.
If Uber and Lyft weren't available, about 20 percent of passengers said they would have taken their own car, Schaller found, and another 20 percent would have taken a taxi. Both situations are more or less a wash for congestion, swapping one car for another.
But the remaining 60 percent said they would have taken buses, trains, subways, walked, biked or wouldn't have made the trip. By hailing an Uber or a Lyft, those passengers are adding cars to the road.