Two citizen groups have lost the latest round in a legal fight to protect White Bear Lake from what they call excessive groundwater pumping, but say they will appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court.
In a ruling released Monday, the Minnesota Court of Appeals sided with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), saying it has complied with state law in regulating water use in the area.
The case was brought by the White Bear Lake Restoration Association, a 1,000-member group of businesses and residents around the region, along with the White Bear Lake Homeowners' Association, who argued that the DNR was failing in its responsibility to protect groundwater around the popular lake.
Last year, Ramsey County District Judge Margaret Marrinan ruled for the lake advocates, blasting the DNR for what she called a "stunning" record of violating state environmental laws in the way it issues groundwater-pumping permits.
Marrinan ordered the DNR to stop issuing the permits until it had studied the full effect of groundwater pumping, and to restrict pumping within a 5-mile radius of the lake when its water levels fall below a certain point. The restrictions would affect nearly a dozen municipalities who pull from the groundwater for drinking water and other needs, and prompted the state Legislature to stay the restrictions until the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled.
Writing for the court, Judge John Rodenberg reversed Marrinan's decision and sent the case back for further administrative proceedings. The DNR did not violate state law or a legal standard known as the "public trust" doctrine, Rodenberg concluded.
Rodenberg's opinion involves a technical interpretation of the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act, a 1971 law that allows citizens to bring a legal action against anyone for damaging the environment. But when the problem conduct involves state-issued permits, Rodenberg said, the appropriate remedy is limited to having the court send it to the appropriate state agency for administrative proceedings.
Rodenberg also ruled that the DNR did not violate the public trust doctrine, arguing that the common-law principle applies to the state's obligation to protect navigable waters, and not groundwater.