A metro-area charter school battered by years of controversy over claims that it promoted religion has decided not to appeal a state decision that forced its closure earlier this summer.
The board of Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TiZA) voted Tuesday evening not to ask the Minnesota Court of Appeals to reverse the state Education Department's denial of an application that would have allowed it to stay open.
"I think it's fairly obvious that TiZA is recognizing that it has been forced to involuntarily cease operations," Shamus O'Meara, an attorney for the school, said after the vote. "Its students are transferred into other schools. The staff has found employment with other schools. Prospects to have an operating school this fall or at any time in the future are bleak."
In Tuesday's resolution, which the board passed on the advice of its attorneys, it also said that TiZA will proceed with orderly closure and dissolution under a bankruptcy petition that court documents filed by the school have previously described as an attempt to reorganize.
The state had issued closure instructions to TiZA shortly before a new law took effect on July 1 disqualifying the school's former authorizer. Summer classes ended abruptly and the school's director advised families to seek new schools -- but TiZA also filed a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11, which businesses typically use when they want to restructure rather than liquidate.
TiZA, which had campuses in Inver Grove Heights and Blaine, served about 540 students, most of whom were Muslim.
O'Meara said that Tuesday's vote signals the school's attempt to effect an "orderly winding-down" of operations. He added that the decision is likely to "dramatically" affect a longstanding lawsuit brought against TiZA by the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, which claims the public school has violated the Constitution by promoting religion. Since the school no longer exists, "We would expect that the ACLU would recognize the obvious and allow the parties to move on with their lives," he said.
The board's vote decreases the likelihood that the First Amendment dispute will go to trial, said Peter Lancaster, an attorney for the ACLU.