"Think not those faithful who praise thy every word and deed, but those who kindly reprove thy faults."
— Socrates
• • •
Those words were inscribed on my seventh-grade yearbook by my English teacher in Lexington, Ky. It is the only such inscription I remember. At the time, the quote stung. Rather than feeling inspired, I felt mystified and a bit hurt. The teacher I most admired didn't seem to think so highly of me after all.
Over the years, however, I've come to understand what Socrates and my teacher meant: Everyone has faults. Flattery may feel good, but constructive criticism from family, friends, colleagues and teachers can be invaluable to one's personal and professional growth.
Early in my previous career as a trial attorney, I conducted an extensive cross-examination of a defendant. I thought I had exposed significant inconsistencies in his story. While the court was in recess, my supervisor told me my efforts had not gone over well. He said the defendant had actually charmed the jury, and he was right. The jury acquitted the defendant in short order. My loss underscored the importance of knowing your audience. If my supervisor had only complimented what I'd done well and ignored what I'd done poorly, I may never have understood why I lost the case.
So as an educator and a father with a son starting college, I've been thinking about how to convey to millennials the importance of learning not just to engage with criticism but to actively pursue it.
For a variety of reasons, many young people have limited experience with even "kind reproof." Instead, they have become accustomed to unbridled praise. We've all read articles and commentaries about the "everyone gets a trophy" phenomenon. Personally, I don't see the harm if we're talking about youth sports. Recognizing participation serves a purpose. Still, trophies rarely lead to substantive improvement.
We educators could do more to encourage a culture of healthy criticism. Some of us eschew red ink literally and figuratively. We no longer write meaningful comments on students' papers. In some cases, we may not set clear expectations for responding to suggestions, such as requiring students to address our criticism by revising and resubmitting papers or assignments.