Minnesota has set a new post-election pattern: Every two years we have a statewide recount.
That's meant weeks of sorting through ballots and waiting and waiting for final results.
"We are very experienced and very prepared," said Secretary of State Mark Ritchie.
But the state may break that pattern this year.
According to polling, the closest statewide contest is over the constitutional amendment to define marriage and ban same-sex marriage. But state law is clear: There is no automatic recount in referendums on constitutional amendment questions.
Even if the marriage amendment or the amendment to require voters to present ID in future elections is within a whisker of passage or failure once the ballots are tallies, that will not mandate a second look.
Instead, any concern about the accuracy of the tally would have to be addressed by the courts. One side or the other, backed by a voter, would have to convince the state Supreme Court that the results certified by election officials were erroneous.
The court, in theory, could order a recount of ballots. But that would be a starkly different process than Minnesota saw in the automatic recounts after the 2008 U.S. Senate race and the 2010 governor's race.