Does Kevin Priestley, who lives in St. Paul, have any objective data to back up his claims that skyways are only used by well-off office workers? ("The social costs of skyway world," Feb. 6). Or that the majority drive to work? That skyway users are mostly whites and that skyways divide us by class?
How did Priestley determine ethnicity use in the Minneapolis skyways? If there is verified percentage data, does it match the percentages by ethnic group, of Minneapolis workers and dwellers by chance?
What does a mail clerk at Ameriprise make a year? How about a clerk at Macy's? At Target? What about the guards in the parking ramps? The waiters and waitresses at eating and drinking establishments? I could go on and on.
As a clerical working mom, years ago, I was thankful for skyways that let me dart out to nearby stores to get things my family needed on my lunch hour.
Priestley's argument against skyways is silly. Keep them, Minneapolis, and be proud of them. It gets cold and rainy here too often not to do so.
Rita Martinez, Minneapolis
UKRAINE
There's no excusing Russia's aggression
A Feb. 5 letter about the crisis in Ukraine trotted out the popular red herring of "NATO expansion" as justification for Russian aggression in Ukraine.
NATO was formed in 1948 as a defensive counterweight to the Soviet "Union," in response to the Soviet refusal to disgorge those nations it had either annexed or occupied during and after World War II. The Soviets responded in 1949 by forming the Warsaw Pact, which included its satellite nations: Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Albania and (East) Germany.
Fast-forward to 1991, when the "prison of nations" — the USSR — collapsed. All of the Soviet satellites named above, plus those nations that had been illegally annexed and occupied for 50 years — Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania — reclaimed their sovereignty. As did Ukraine, and even Russia itself.