As many have heard, the dancers of five suburban high schools located in Chaska, Lakeville, Apple Valley, Plymouth and Eden Prairie all protested the awards ceremony at the state high school high-kick dance tournament because they believe that the Faribault team cheated on its routine, even though the Minnesota State High School League stated Faribault did not. However, I hope all involved see this as a learning experience. Protests occur all the time over controversial decisions made in courtrooms and by juries (see the Black Lives Matter movement) or in terms of controversial government policy (think, as an example, about Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the policies imposed by Wisconsin Republicans). To walk a mile in someone else's shoes is a valuable lesson. May what transpired inspire these students to think harder and be more understanding of what other people feel when they think justice is not served.
William Cory Labovitch, South St. Paul
• • •
As a former dance team parent and avid fan who attended the state tournament, I am troubled by five top teams' head coaches encouraging and convincing 100-plus student-athletes that if you feel you've been treated unfairly, the right course of action is to pout, quit and make a public spectacle. I can think of many more productive life lessons they could have taught under the circumstances. Instead, what the coaches did was, as the kids say, so high school.
Amy Tamburino, Minneapolis
• • •
Regarding the Faribault dance team's alleged plagiarism of a dance routine: So, if the Eden Prairie football team wins a state championship with an offense similar to one used by a school in Ohio or Texas, that shouldn't be allowed, either?
Just trying to understand.
Derek Terrell, Hopkins
'FIFTY SHADES'
Like pornography, and just as damaging
I would take issue with a Feb. 14 letter writer who, responding to an earlier article comparing erotic novels such as "Fifty Shades of Grey" to pornography, contends that "a book doesn't require the exploitation of vulnerable young women and men; it's just a fantasy shared between the author and the reader, no harm done."
A lot of harm is done. A pornographic book teaches that the abuse of (usually) women is a normal, expected and healthy part of a romantic relationship. This teaching is definitely "exploitation of vulnerable young women and men," whether it is through photographs or words. How can we expect the young to learn that a healthy relationship involves mutual respect when they are constantly barraged with pornography that is anything but respectful?