The University of Minnesota's Board of Regents will welcome four new members in May right as it begins key discussions about tuition rates and the school's $4 billion budget.
The new regents — a Mayo Clinic doctor, an engineer, a family farmer and a current U student — are studying up on university policies and issues as they prepare to help decide how the state's flagship institution responds to and learns from pandemic-related challenges. Their presence will alter the dynamics of the U's 12-member governing board, tilting it closer to gender balance, and their priorities will influence the direction of the university over the course of their six-year terms.
In the coming months, regents will decide how to best address a more than $150 million budget shortfall for this fiscal year and set the budget for the coming year. The latter discussion will include a decision on whether to increase tuition; university leaders froze tuition for the current academic year to provide financial relief to students at its five campuses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"I am going to be extremely hesitant to increase tuition for resident students," said Regent James Farnsworth, a senior at the Twin Cities campus and executive director of the Highland Business Association in St. Paul. "I don't think coming out of the pandemic that it's a good message to send to our students."
Farnsworth noted he will be the only member of the board who knows what it's like to be a student during the pandemic. The sudden switch to online learning was jarring for many students, Farnsworth said, but there are lessons to be learned from delivering college classes in remote and hybrid settings.
He hopes the university will continue offering distance learning options beyond the pandemic to increase accessibility for nontraditional students who are balancing full-time jobs, parenting duties or other commitments.
"I think it should be something that students are able to opt into," he said.
Additionally, Farnsworth wants the board to review the long-term direction of the U's athletics department. He still has questions about athletic director Mark Coyle's decision last fall to eliminate three men's sports programs — tennis, gymnastics and indoor track and field — in an effort to address a budget deficit and Title IX compliance concerns.