Why are so many journalists — particularly liberal journalists — mocking the true believers of Donald Trump?
Because it's just so darn easy, that's why.
It's much safer to ridicule Trump supporters than to dare question Planned Parenthood's gruesome and tax-subsidized baby organ harvests. It's much easier to do a Trump-said-something-crazy story than to question Hillary Rodham Clinton for compromising national security by using a private e-mail server. And it's less risky to mock Trumpians for their nativist ways than to question the racism inherent in the angry all-lives-don't-really-matter crowd.
Questioning Planned Parenthood or Clinton's lies or racial hashtag dog whistles can lead to frosty looks in the newsroom.
I'm no fan of Trump. He's a betrayer, though his fans don't know it yet. And he can't be elected president with his high negatives with women voters. He's also a pretend conservative Republican (actually more of a Democrat) who promises, in Big Government fashion, to wield the federal hammer and impose his Trumpian will upon the republic.
But his basic populist appeal is this:
He knows American politicians are corrupt because he's bought dozens of his own and says so. And he vows to kick the High Priests of Political Correctness — meaning journalists — in the private areas until they cry.
It's no wonder that self-censoring journalists (including the handmaiden scribes of the establishment GOP) have animosity toward this wild and wealthy populist with the bad hair. This animosity is often expressed by mocking the people who flock to hear him, since ridicule is our one stable currency.