WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has been receptive in recent years to immigrants who are fighting deportation from the United States over minor drug crimes. On Wednesday, the justices entertained the least serious transgression yet — the case of a Tunisian man who was deported after he pleaded guilty in Kansas state court to possessing drug paraphernalia.
The item in question: A sock that contained four pills of the stimulant Adderall.
The justices sounded almost incredulous that the Obama administration deported the man, Moones Mellouli, over the conviction and that it was defending its actions in the Supreme Court.
Mellouli came to the United States in 2004 on a student visa and was living in the country legally when he was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs. A jailhouse search turned up the pills in a sock.
He pleaded guilty to the paraphernalia charge, which did not specify kind of drug the sock held or how much.
"If it's not such a big deal that the state is willing to let him cop a plea to drug paraphernalia, why should that be the basis for deportation under federal law?" Chief Justice John Roberts asked Justice Department lawyer Rachel Kovner.
"Your Honor, we don't think that Congress viewed drug crimes that way," Kovner replied.
She faced similar comments over and over as she gamely sought to defend the administration's reading of the provision of federal immigration law that allows deportation for drug crimes.