Jane Brody's mother was 49 when she died. This was 30 years ago, when ovarian cancer was an ordeal of experimental chemotherapy and long hospital stays. Twice, she tried to take control of her own life -- or death -- first by slitting her wrists, and later by drinking rubbing alcohol.
"Twice, to my 16-year-old thinking, her life was saved," Brody said. "But when I grew up, I asked myself, saved for what? More misery? An increasingly bleak future with no hope for recovery? If I were in a similar position, would I want to be rescued?"
Brody, whose journalism career began at the Minneapolis Tribune, has written eight books about health and is the New York Times' personal-health columnist. Her latest book, "Jane Brody's Guide to the Great Beyond" (Random House, $26), pulls together what we need to know about end-of-life issues as we approach the universal condition for which there is no cure: mortality. Here are excerpts from a conversation with Brody.
Q Why do we need to be thinking about how our lives will end?
A Because people can't let go. So much money is spent futilely on end-of-life care. We just can't give up these last-minute interventions, but it's more painful, and not just for the person who is dying, but for the survivors who witness it. Even though Americans are living longer and living better, most people are not dying better. They're dying worse.
Q How do you distinguish between accepting and surrendering to death?
A Surrendering is when you have a medical option, but you decide you don't want to do it. Acceptance is when there really isn't an option anymore. You're fighting City Hall, a battle you can't possibly win. And instead of fighting, you say, "Let me be as comfortable as I can be. Let me say my goodbyes. Let me make my wishes known about my worldly goods." When you're hooked up to all those machines, this doesn't happen.
Q You urge people to appoint a proxy. Isn't a living will enough?