A Burnsville boy who pleaded with the City Council to let him keep his pet chickens is likely to get some bad news tonight.
After his family was told by a city official that the chickens had to go, Stefan Remund, 11, asked the council to reconsider. Now, after researching the issue, city employees are ready to recommend that the city's animal ordinance remain intact -- which could mean goodbye to Pudd'n Legs, McCluck and the four other Plymouth Bard Rocks and one Buff Orpington that lay eggs for the Remund family.
When you're 11 and the city is deciding whether to take away your pets, a kid might not be thinking lofty thoughts, or even logical ones.
But Stefan, who has already gotten the news that things aren't likely to go his way tonight, is still ready to offer an impassioned defense of his birds, which the family raised from chicks.
"They're afraid that everyone is going to want to have chickens," Stefan said. "We're exceptional. I don't know anybody in the neighborhood who wants to have chickens. I think there's going to be a select few. Burnsville is a 62,000-person city. I don't think a ton of people are going to spring into it."
At the council's behest, city employees reviewed ordinances of surrounding communities and Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth. A memo says in part:
"Of the ten cities researched, six do not allow chickens in residential zoned areas. The four that do allow them do so with restrictions to the number, the type of enclosure, and in two cases (Minneapolis and St. Paul) require a permit and consent of 75 to 80 percent of the surrounding neighbors."
The staff is recommending that council members "make no changes to the current ordinance because it is similar and in some cases less restrictive than the surrounding cities."